Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1716 <br /> <br />FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJEC1', COLORADO <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />water (including the 2,000 acre-feet of Ww.tz ditch water) and an <br />ultimate addit,ional need of 15,000 aere-feet by the year 2000. The <br />city has also expressed interesi in obtaining treatment of its present <br />supply of 21 ,000 acre-feet. ' <br />29. Canon City ano Rocky Ford obtain municipal water from the <br />Arkansas River. Canon Citv has not, requested project water. <br />30. The towns of Manzanola, Rockv Ford, La .Junta, Las Animas, <br />and Lamar, and the off-stream towns of Crowley, Wiley, and Eads <br />have requested treated Illunicipal water from thc project to replace <br />entirely their present supplies. Their immediate needs are abollt <br />8,000 acre-feet. <br />31. Flood control.-Few damaging floods of recO/.d have occurred in <br />the diversion area aud in the Arkansas Valley down to Cunon CIty. <br />From there eastward, however, dmnnging floods increase in frequency <br />and volume t,o the mouth of the Purgatoire RiYer. The largest flood <br />of record in the project area occurred in .June 1921. Intense rains <br />caused flows at Puchlo cstimofed at 103.000 second-feet. Down- <br />stream tributnries cOlltrihutrd to the Hood until the peak of 200!000 <br />second-feet WtLS rCRehed nt Ln .Tutltu. Tlw flood kill,,'d at. ICll.!'it 78- <br />persons; propert,y t.hunages cx('ecded $19,000,000, inclut..ling $10,000,- <br />000 in Pueblo. <br />32. As a result of that disastrous flood, a bOI'1'ie,' dam across the <br />Arkansas River, 6 miles west of Pucblo, and an improved flood way <br />channel through the city were completed in 1926. ,Another flood- <br />control structure, the John !\fartin Reservoir, locntr.d 011 the Arkansas <br />River near Lamar, Colo., was completed in 1949 by the Corps of <br />Engineers. A multiple-purpose project, 281,000 acre-feet of its <br />701,000 acre-foot capacity are allocated to flood control. <br />33. A flood danger still exists from Pueblo downstream to the John <br />J\Jartin Reservoir. The Corps of Engineers has estimated that the <br />annual damages along that reach of the ri,er a"erage $890,000. The <br />initial development could eliminate about 66 percent of that probable <br />damage. <br />34. Associated ll~eds.-Sediment control, stream pollution abate- <br />ment, enhancement of the environment for fish and wildlife, and <br />provision for recreation are other nee(ls of the project areo. associated <br />with water development. Industrial expansion, conservation of <br />forest and range bnds, and stabilization of the entire economy by <br />balanced diversification of interest are recognized as long-range <br />objectives. The initial deyelopment could immediately umeliorate <br />some of the problems stemming from those needs. Resolution of the <br />long-ra.nge objecti\'cs will require coordinated and unselfish coopel'a- <br />~ tion by all cit.izensJ agencies, and entities concerned. <br />~> 35. !\-Ient.ion ht18 aU.l'adv ueen made of the acute sedimrntatioll <br />lirbblem affec:ting irrigutiOJ; in the lI1ain ArkanRas Valley. At Pueblo <br />the river annually transpOl.t3 about 944 acre-feet of sediment. Ap- <br />proximately 42 percent. of that sediment is deposited in reservoirs, <br />canals, and lat,erals; about 38 percent uecomes undesired deposit.ion <br />on t.he i..l'rign.t.ed lanth~. Aggl'nda.tion of the river channel. has made <br />some il'rig-ation' diversion struetures inoperative" other diversion <br />structures- have:tlleCCSsarily bnen raised. Remov~d sediment now <br />lines some canal banks and further disposal has become very ex- <br />pensive, Canal sand tmps have. become inoperative. The ouly <br />apparent un~c~hate solu~lOn IS prOVISIOn of reserVOIl" space specifically <br />for the deposlt-lOn of sedllDent. <br /> <br />, <br />" <br />