Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />r <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />i <br />i <br />I <br />II <br />Ii <br /> <br />;;; The chemical quality of surface water and ground water is generally <br />'~) good under natural conditions. Some deterioration occurs in the lower <br />~ segments of the principal streams and locally elsewhere, especially <br />to during periods of low flow. Return flows from irrigation and from <br />~ municipal and industrial uses increase the deterioration of natural <br />water quality. <br /> <br />Interior drainage, a primary feature of the Region, results in very <br />high total dissolved-solids concentrations in the major terminal sinks. <br />Great Salt Lake has concentrations on the order of 290,000 milligrams per <br />liter. Ground water in the Great Salt Lake Desert, also is highly con- <br />centrated. Walker Lake has total dissolved-solids concentrations of <br />8,500 milligrams per liter and Pyramid Lake about 5,000 milligrams per <br />liter. Ground water is similarly poor in chemical quality in many low- <br />land areas. <br /> <br />The total nominal water supply of 9.6 MAF comes from several supply <br />elements. Approximate values for these are: principal streams, 2.9 MAF; <br />upstream depletion along principal streams, 3.0 MAF; secondary and minor <br />streams, 1.4 MAF; and natural ground-water discharge, 2.3 MAF. <br /> <br />The principal uses at the 1965 level of development, together with <br />some related uses, such as nonirrigated meadow and unmanaged fish and <br />wildlife areas, result in an annual depletion rate of about 6 MAF. This <br />value does not include depletion from the terminal lakes; Great Salt Lake, <br />Pyramid Lake, and Walker Lake~ Their .net annual rate of evaporation, though <br />variable from year to year, was about 2.3 MAF for the 1965 year-end stage. <br /> <br />The residual nominal supply was about 3.6 MAF. Of this total, 40 <br />percent is principal streamflow, 40 percent ground-water discharge, and <br />20 'percent .is secondary and minor streamflow. Possibly 1. 4 MAF of <br />principal streamflow goes to the terminal lakes. Part of the residual <br />secondary and minor streamflow and natural ground water reaches the <br />terminal lakes, especially Great Salt Lake, but most is widely distributed <br />in the numerous valleys of the Great Basin Region. <br /> <br />The natural characteristics of the several elements of the residual <br />water supply place limitations on the availability for development for <br />general use. Considering these aspects, about 1.8 MAF of the residual <br />water supply may be available annually for development. This amount <br />includes about 1.0 MAF from principal streams, 0.2 MAF from secondary <br />and minor streams, and 0.6 MAF of water intercepted from natural ground- <br />water discharge. An additional 0.4 MAF of ground water may be available <br />if treated to improve quality. In the upstream depletion areas about 0.3 <br />MAF may be salvaged by improved management. Reduction of evaporation <br />from Utah Lake will save about 0.07 MAF of water annually. <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />I <br />