Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SUMMARY (Cont inued) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />"" <br />-J <br />o <br /> <br />Summary Tab Ie 4 <br />Environmental comparison of alternatives <br />Alternative <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Salt reduction (tons/year) <br />Desert shrub cover (acres) <br />Antelope,l/ cottontail <br />rabbit, black-tailed <br />jackrabbit, golden <br />eagle, horned lark, <br />burrowing owl, and <br />white-tailed prairie <br />dog habitat <br />Mule deer habitat <br />Wetland cover type <br />Waterfowl hazard createdl/ <br />Livestock grazing loss <br />(animal unit months) <br />Endangered species <br />Co lorado Ri ver <br />deplet ion..!/l.1 <br />(ac re- fee t/ year) <br />Potential loss of black- <br />footed ferr~t habitat <br />Cult'jral resourcesl/ <br />Prehistoric sites affected <br />Historic sites affected <br />Prehistoric/historic <br />sites affected <br />NationaL Register <br />eli~ible sites <br />1/ Significant areas of environmental concern. <br />2/ NSI = No significant impact. <br />3/ Depletions reduce water avaiLability for the CoLorado squawfish <br />and humpback chub. <br />4/ X := The desert shrub cover type represents potential black- <br />footed ferret habitat. <br />S/ Known sites which couLd be directly impacted by construction. <br />6/ Known sites in the vicinity of features which could be affected <br />by naturaL deterioration, erosion, etc.. whether or not either aLterna- <br />tive was developed. <br /> <br />OG <br />287,000 <br /> <br />G <br />176,000 <br /> <br />No <br />act ion <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />-10,000 <br />-1,000 <br />NSl~/ <br />Yes <br /> <br />-6,000 <br />-500 <br />NSlY <br />Yes <br /> <br />NSlY <br /> <br />No <br /> <br />-800 <br /> <br />-400 <br /> <br />15,560 <br /> <br />8,560 <br /> <br />Y!:J <br /> <br />x!:../ <br /> <br />2/16 <br />I <br /> <br />2/10 <br />1 <br /> <br />~/18 <br />YI7 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />y, <br /> <br />6/5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />S-8 <br />