Laserfiche WebLink
<br />liter. Nitrite plus nitrate as nitrogen ranged from less <br />than 0.1 milligram per liter at all sites to 0.53 milligram <br />per liter at the most downstream site. Phosphorus con- <br />centrations in 45 of 51 samples at all sites were equal to <br />or less than 0.03 milligram per liter. Periodic increases <br />in concentrations of nutrients at the two downstream <br />sites were attributed to intermittent runoff from agri- <br />cuIturallands, <br />Concentration ranges for 22 trace constituents in <br />the White River were determined. Concentrations of <br />15 trace constituents commonly were detected, and <br />concentrations of 11 constituents generally were great- <br />est downstream from Meeker. Suspended sediment <br />could be an important source or transportation medium <br />for eight trace constituents, <br />The White River is an important and renewable <br />source of good quality water in northwestern Colorado. <br />Streamflow that originates as snowmelt in the North <br />Fork and South Fork Basins dilutes and transports large <br />concentrations of suspended sediment and dissolved <br />solids that enter the White River in the central part of <br />the basin. Some decrease in water quality occurs <br />downstream from Meeker. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The White Riveris a principal river in northwest- <br />ern Colorado (fig. 1) and an important source of water <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Historically, water <br />use and diversion within the White River Basin have <br />been for agricultural and domestic needs. Constraints <br />on water use generally were limited to years when <br />basin runoff was small. However, during the national <br />energy crisis in the 1970's and early 1980's, projected <br />water needs in support of proposed oil-shale projects in <br />the semiarid Piceance Basin caused an increase in fil- <br />ings for water diversions from the White River. The <br />potential losses of water from the White River from <br />additional diversions and the increases in water-use <br />demands in the Lower Colorado River Basin prompted <br />concerns that the White River would become an over- <br />allocated river and that water shortages would be com- <br />mon. <br />To meet projected local and downstream water <br />needs, water managers reviewed and implemented <br />plans to manage and store basin runoff. Kenney Reser- <br />voir, with a storage capacity of 13,800 acre-ft, was <br />completed on the White River about 8 mi upstream <br />from Rangely (fig. 1) in late 1984. Several proposals <br />for additional main-stem impoundments presently <br />(1988) are being studied. Decisions related to the opti- <br />mal location of each impoundment and the final <br />approval of each proposal will require an understand- <br />ing of the hydrologic characteristics .of the basin. <br /> <br />Although some hydrologic data essential for <br />effective water management of the White River are <br />available, comprehensive data collections and data <br />anl\lyses that describe and quantify sediment and <br />water-quality characteristics with variations in stream <br />discharge are incomplete. To address this need, the <br />U.S. Geological Survey entered into a cooperative <br />study in 1986 with the Yellow-Jacket Water Conser- <br />vancy District to evaluate sediment and dissolved- <br />solids transport and water-quality characteristics for <br />the White River in northwestern Colorado. Water <br />Users Association No.1, Rio Blanco County, and the <br />Colorado River Water Conservation District provided <br />some additional support for the study. <br /> <br />Purpose and Scope <br /> <br />This report presents an evaluation of selected <br />hydrologic data for the White River collected during <br />water years 1975-88. Specifically, the report: <br /> <br />1. Quantifies annual sediment loads and defines <br />sediment-size characteristics that occurred at <br />selected streamflow-gaging stations (herein- <br />after referred to as sites) on the White River. <br />The report relates changes in sediment charac- <br />teristics in the White River with differences in <br />basin hydrology and physiography and pro- <br />vides estimates of volume displacement and <br />capacity loss in reservoirs from sediment <br />retention. <br /> <br />2. Quantifies dissolved-solids loads and <br />describes changes in water-quality characteris- <br />tics that occurred at selected sites on the White <br />River. Water-quality changes are correlated <br />with variations in stream discharge and spe- <br />cific conductance, and differences in water <br />quality are related to differences in basin phys- <br />iography. <br /> <br />Approach <br /> <br />Water years 1975-88 (from October 1, 1974, to <br />September 30, 1988) were selected for study because <br />streamflow during the 14 years ranged from record <br />highs to record lows, and the hydrologic conditions <br />generally were representative of long-term hydrologic <br />conditions for the basin. Periodic sediment and water- <br />quality sampling also were begun in the mid-1970's at <br />several sites on the White River and on the North Fork <br /> <br />2 Sediment Treneport end Water-QuaUly Characteristics and Loads, White River, Northwestern Coloredo, Water Vears <br />1975-88 <br />