My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07703
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07703
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:32:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.500
Description
Glenwood-Dotsero Springs Unit - Salinity Control Projects
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/18/1985
Title
Preliminary Assessment of the Salt Tolerant Emergent Plant (STEP) Process: I. Species Selection and Criteria Definition
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.- <br />v <br /> <br />00 <br />r- <br />(~ production ponds that have not established full densities or <br />C~ mature root and tuber stands. Each indicates daily rates <br />c; between 0.4 and 0,75 inches per day. Established stands of <br />Typha and Cyperus exhibit rates between 0,98 and 1.5 inches per <br />day. This suggests that initial evapotranspiration rates will <br />be lower than might be realized after the absorptive root zone <br />is fully developed, Fu~ther support for this is given by Pratt <br />(Personal Communication, 1985) who indicates that transpiration <br />rates have increased annually in his Cattail ponds each of the <br />three years since it was planted. <br /> <br />These data were collected in areas of high humidity and would <br />thus be expected to represent low values compared with potential <br />rates in the G~and Junction region. On the basis of the <br />botanical, environmental, and experimental considerations <br />presented here, evapotranspiration rates equivalent to the low <br />median value of 0,75 inches per day is judged to be a realistic <br />expectation for a young stand in Colo~ado, over the period of <br />its growth season, <br /> <br />2. Production <br /> <br />Production, when coupled with an obligation to concentrate salts <br />from within a saline water inflow, depends upon the adaptive <br />capacity of a plant to function in saline environments, the way <br />the environment is enginee~ed to take advantage of that <br />capacity, the relationship between photosynthetic activity and <br />the amount of solar radiation available, and the length of the <br />growing season, Growing season, in turn, is a direct function <br />of temperatu~e and the duration of the freeze-free period, <br /> <br />a, Impact of Salinity <br /> <br />Salinity is known to reduce yield in all plants; the questions <br />however are 1) under what conditions and 2) to what extent, The <br />very large majority of studies done have focused on answering <br />the second question on the basis of single va~iable laboratory <br />experiments. Parrondo, Gosselink and Hopkinson (1978), for <br />example grew three salt marsh grasses (Spartina alterniflora, <br />Spartina cynosuroides, and Distichlis spicata under controlled <br />conditions, p~oviding only a graded scale of salt solutions <br />(ranging from NaCI = 0 g/liter to 32 g/liter) as the rooting <br />medium. Under their conditions. yields of all plants declined <br />with increasing salinity, Effects were general, since <br />root-shoot ratios remained fairly constant. This study. as well <br />as similar studies by McMillan (1959) and Choudhuri (1968) on <br />Typha, Rozema and Blom (1977) on A~rostis stolonifera and Juncus <br />~erardii, Haines and Dunn (1976) on Spartina alterniflora, and <br />Falco and Cali on the germination of salt marsh plant seeds. led <br />to the conclusion that yields will invariably decline as salt <br />concentrations increase, <br /> <br />Turner (1976) observerd that the productivity of salt marsh <br />species unde~goes a north-south gradient that parallels total <br />solar energy inputs at a .20 - .35% conversion efficiency, and <br /> <br />19, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.