My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07697
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07697
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:32:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
7/1/2001
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2001
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Habitat loss is one of the single greatest causes of declines in populations of native <br /> <br />fishes in North America (Williams et aI. 1989), The need to preserve minimum stream flows <br /> <br /> <br />was recognized by the state of Colorado with the passage of Senate Bill 97 in 1973, Espegren <br /> <br /> <br />(1998) states that most in stream flow water right filings in Colorado have been for protecting <br /> <br /> <br />minimum flow for cold water (headwater) habitats, The most common methodologies used in . <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado are the R2Cross method (Nehring 1979) and Instream Flow Incremental <br /> <br /> <br />Methodology (IFIM) (Bovee 1982). IFIM estimates the amount of usable habitat for fish as a <br /> <br /> <br />function of discharge by combining habitat suitability curves with the hydraulic model. The <br /> <br /> <br />habitat component of the model has received much criticism because of assumptions implicit <br /> <br /> <br />with using suitability curves and assumptions of positive relationships between habitat <br /> <br /> <br />availability and fish abundance, Validation of these assumptions have been obstacles for <br /> <br /> <br />successfully using IFIM to model minimum flow impacts on large warm water rivers of the <br /> <br /> <br />west slope (Rose and Hahn 1989), <br /> <br /> <br />Currently there is no standardized approach to establish minimum flow needs on warm <br /> <br /> <br />water river sections, and the use of sophisticated models appear to be required in high profile <br /> <br /> <br />situations (Espegren 1998), Warm water fish assemblages appear to require a more intensive <br /> <br />approach to instream flow modeling compared to cold water fish communities, Warm water <br /> <br /> <br />river reaches tend to be lower gradient and have higher channel complexity and sediment <br /> <br /> <br />loads, Warm water fish populations tend to have higher species diversity, Also habitat <br /> <br /> <br />suitability curves derived from microhabitat observations do not adequately describe habitat <br /> <br />use for many warm water species, A broader community-level perspective, as opposed to an <br /> <br />indicator species approach, may be required to protect all habitats of a functioning warm <br /> <br />water stream ecosystem. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.