Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Wetted stream width was found to be higher on the Yampa River for most flows of <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />width is determined using channel surveys. But even with the 18 m width the Dolores had the <br /> <br />lowest density estimate for bluehead of all sites. Density of roundtail chub and catfish were <br /> <br />only somewhat less than the Colorado stations and higher that the Yampa River at Duffy and <br /> <br />Sevens. <br /> <br />Table 9. Dolores River population estimates with 95% C.I. and (recaptures), and density <br />estimates (No./IOOOm') for the Big Gypsum station, 2000. <br /> <br /> Bia GVD, 2000 BiO Gyp, 200 <br /> NO./km ",C.I. No./IOOOm <br /> ( recaos <br />Total fish 197:1:15% (102) 10.9 <br />Bluehead Sucker 3f67% (3) 0.17 <br />Flannelmouth S 36:1:39% (15) 2.0 <br />Roundtail Chub 81:1:16% (67 4.5 <br />Green Sunfish 5:1:58% (5) 0.29 <br />Channel Catfish 69f61 % (8) 3.8 <br />Black Bullhead 14:1:78% (4) 0.76 <br />CarD 24:1:181% (1) 1.35 <br />Brown trout 1.2:1:NR (0) 0.07 <br /> <br />Habitat Comoosition <br /> <br />Analysis of habitat composition has been completed for two sites, the Duffy on the <br /> <br />Yampa River and the Com Lake site on the Colorado River. Stewart (2000) presents the <br /> <br />methods and documentation for these results but this report only provides a summary of his <br /> <br />presentation of that data. <br /> <br />interest. At a flow of 600 cfs the wetted width at Duffy is 63.1 m compared to 48.6 m at Com <br /> <br />Lake (Colorado River). An adjustment was made for this report to present fish density <br /> <br />(number per surface area) based on the wetted width at a typical base flow. In prior reports <br /> <br />the fish density was based on the Colorado River having a wider channel (based on bankfull <br /> <br />40 <br />