My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07697
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07697
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:32:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
7/1/2001
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2001
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />strongly influenced by predation and competition, which means size structure, as well as <br /> <br />species composition, is not regulated by habitat availability and therefore is not what would be <br /> <br />expected if nonnative predators were absent. <br /> <br />No small roundtail chub were collected in the Yampa River in 2000 and size ranged <br /> <br /> <br />from 33 to 44 em at Sevens (Figure A13) and from 41 to 48 em at Duffy (Figure AI4). Only <br /> <br /> <br />one chub was collected at Lily Park in 2000 at 40 em (Figure AI5). On the Dolores River <br /> <br /> <br />there were only small chub and sizes ranged from 2 cm to 30 em (Figure AI6). On the <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado River both large and small chubs were present at Com Lake (Figure A 17) and at <br /> <br />Clifton (Figure AI8). <br />Size structure of roundtail chub has the same pattern as described for the native <br /> <br />suckers, large fish in the Yampa, small fish in the Dolores and all sizes in the Colorado River. <br /> <br />The fact that all three native species have similar tendencies in size structure indicates similar <br /> <br /> <br />factors are responsible. The lack of a large predator population and the fact there is a high <br /> <br /> <br />percent of native fish in the population in the Colorado River indicates size distribution <br /> <br /> <br />reflects the potential that is a function of habitat availability. Length frequency for native fish <br /> <br /> <br />on the Colorado River is probably nearest to pristine or ideal for the native species, bluehead <br /> <br />and flannel mouth sucker and roundtail chub. However the Dolores River has a definite <br /> <br />absence oflarger individuals of all native fish. This is probably not a function of predation or <br /> <br /> <br />competition, since predators would remove small not large fish. The lack oflarge fish is <br /> <br /> <br />probably a function of habitat availability, indicating a lack of deep runs and rimes in this <br /> <br /> <br />river. At this time it is not hypothesized whether size structure on the Dolores is pristine or is <br /> <br />a recent result of habitat or flow modification which has reduced potential. The author felt <br /> <br />that sedimentation in rimes was high and invertebrate numbers were relatively low. Native <br /> <br />suckers have a normal shape to their length frequency larger fish at Lily Park site on the <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.