My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07697
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07697
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:32:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP - Riverine Fish Flow Investigations
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
7/1/2001
Author
CDOW
Title
Riverine Fish Flow Investigations 2001
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />numbers ofYOY small mouth bass were collected in each year at Duffy with similar counts <br /> <br /> <br />between years with higher and lower runoff flows. Hawkins et al (1997) reported the <br /> <br /> <br />occurrence of nonnative fish were fairly rare in the Little Snake River and attributed this to <br /> <br /> <br />highly variable physical factors such as flows, temperature and turbidity. Hawkins felt the <br /> <br /> <br />extreme low flows he observed could be beneficial to the native fish population because <br /> <br /> <br />nonnative fish were not common in his study sites. His conclusions for the Little Snake are <br /> <br /> <br />not consistent with results of this study. In the Yampa River species composition was similar <br /> <br /> <br />in the years with low base flow compared to the other years indicating non-native fish survival <br /> <br /> <br />is comparable to native fish under flows experience between 1998 and 2000. The data do not <br /> <br /> <br />indicate that peak or minimum flows have hampered or repressed abundance of most <br /> <br />nonnative fish species in the Yampa River. <br /> <br />The Duffy station, because of its low composition of native fish, does not appear to be <br /> <br /> <br />a suitable site for making inferences about habitat use by native fIsh. When the Duffy study <br /> <br /> <br />site was selected it was believed to be representative of the Yampa between Juniper and Craig <br /> <br /> <br />for both fish and habitat composition. However it appears that competition and predation are <br /> <br />influencing population structure at this site (and river reach) independent of habitat <br /> <br />composition. Because of this it was necessary to add a new site on the Yampa River, one with <br /> <br />a higher native fish composition. So in 2000 a site was added at Lily Park. <br /> <br />Species composition was more variable between years for fish under 15 em for the <br /> <br /> <br />1998 to 2000 period (Table AZ). Sand shiners were the most common small fish at Sevens in <br /> <br /> <br />all three years, but small mouth bass was most common at Duffy. In the year 2000, there was <br /> <br /> <br />noticeably fewer native species in the sample, only 3% at Sevens and 6% at Duffy. Very few <br /> <br /> <br />speckled dace and mottled sculpin, both species generally associated with rime habitats, were <br /> <br /> <br />observed or collected at both stations in 2000 compared to 1998 and 1998. This indicates <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.