<br />NEW MEXICO GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY- TWENTy-SECOND FIELD CONFERENCE
<br />
<br />131
<br />
<br />TABLE 1.
<br />Summary of the hydrologic character of the geologic units, San Luis Valley, Colorado.
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />HYDROLOGIC
<br />CHARACTER
<br />
<br />Transmissivity ranges from
<br />1,000 to 250,000 gallons per
<br />day per foot (134-33,500
<br />square feet per day). Specific
<br />yield is estimated to be 0.20.
<br />
<br />Transmissivity ranges from
<br />1,500 to 1,500,000 gallons per
<br />day per foot (201-201.000
<br />square feet per day) in zones
<br />tapped by existing wells. Stor-
<br />age coefficient is estimated to
<br />be 0.008. Water is under
<br />pressure.
<br />
<br />Not tapped by wells. Prob-
<br />ably Dot water bearing.
<br />
<br />HYDROLOGIC
<br />UNIT
<br />Unconfined
<br />aquifer
<br />
<br />THICKNESS
<br />(FEET)
<br />0-200
<br />
<br />PHYSICAL
<br />CHARACTER
<br />Unconsolidated clay,
<br />silt, sand, and gravel.
<br />
<br />WATER
<br />SUPPLY
<br />
<br />Yields as much as
<br />3,000 gallons per
<br />minute to wells.
<br />
<br />~
<br />I
<br />
<br />SYSTEM OR
<br />SERIES
<br />
<br />GEOLOGIC
<br />UNlT
<br />
<br />Holocene
<br />to
<br />Oligocene
<br />
<br />Valley fill
<br />
<br />Confined
<br />aquifer
<br />
<br />Unconsolidated clay,
<br />silt, sand, and gravel
<br />interbedded with
<br />volcanic flows and
<br />tuffs.
<br />
<br />Yields as much as
<br />4,000 gallons pe'
<br />minute to wells.
<br />
<br />50-30,000
<br />
<br />None.
<br />
<br />Precambrian
<br />
<br />Crystalline
<br />rocks
<br />
<br />Granite, gneiss, and
<br />schist.
<br />
<br />tering the valley and precipitation on the vaHey floor pro-
<br />vide recharge to the unconfined aquifer. Upward leakage
<br />from the confined aquifer is also a source of recharge. Dis-
<br />charge from this aquifer is by wells, evapotranspiration,
<br />and seepage to streams.
<br />The principal source of recharge to the confined aquifer
<br />is seepage from mountaiu streams that flow across the allu-
<br />vial fans flanking the valley floor. The "clay series" is ab-
<br />sent at the edge of the valley, permitting recharge to beds
<br />that constitute the confined aquifer in the main part of the
<br />valley. The mountain streams show significant losses as
<br />they cross the porous surface of the fans. For example,
<br />seepage measurements made July 6, 1967, on Deadman
<br />Creek south of Crestone (northeast part of vaHey) showed
<br />that the 7 cfs (cubic feet per second) measured at the can-
<br />yon mouth was completely dissipated within about 8 miles;
<br />all but I cfs was lost in the first 3.7 miles. The confined
<br />aquifer underlies most of the valley and the water has
<br />sufficient head to flow at the land surface in an area of
<br />approximately 1,400 square miles. The major discharge
<br />from the confined aquifer is by wells, springs, and upward
<br />leakage through the confining beds into the unconfined
<br />aquifer. A small amount may discharge as underflow into
<br />New Mexico.
<br />The quality of water in the confined aquifer generally is
<br />better than that in the unconfined aquifer according to
<br />Powell (1958). The concentration of dissolved solids in 41
<br />samples from the confined aquifer ranged from 70 to 437
<br />mg/I (milligrams per liter) and, in 271 samples from the
<br />unconfined aquifer, ranged from 52 to 13,800 mg/1. The
<br />least mineralized water in the unconfined aquifer occurs
<br />on the west side of the valley_ The mineral concentration
<br />increases toward the sump area of the closed basin prob-
<br />ably because of solution of aquifer materials and by evapora-
<br />tive concentration in areas of a shaHow water table.
<br />
<br />DEVELOPMENT OF WATER SUPPLIES
<br />
<br />The principal source of water for irrigation in the San
<br />Luis Valley between 1880 and 1950 was surface water. A
<br />
<br />large network of canals was built in 1880-90 to irrigate
<br />lands in the eastern and central parts of the closed basin.
<br />By 1915 most of the area around Mosca and Hooper (cen-
<br />tral part of valley) became waterlogged because of this
<br />irrigation. Drainage systems constructed between 1911 and
<br />1921 to reclaim watedogged lands aHeviated some of the
<br />problems but created waterlogging in areas downgradient.
<br />Other areas are intentionally waterlogged in the process of
<br />subirrigation. The subirrigation practice continues because
<br />locally it is considered to be essential to successful growth
<br />of crops.
<br />The number of large-capacity wells (yield more than
<br />300 gallons per minute) in the San Luis Valley has more
<br />than quadrupled during the last 20 years. By the end of
<br />1969 there were about 2,920 large-capacity irrigation weHs
<br />in the valley_ Of this total, about 2,270 tap the uncon-
<br />fined aquifer and about 650 tap the confined aquifer. Of
<br />the 650 large-capacity irrigation wells tapping the confined
<br />aquifer, 94 range in depth from 1,000 to 2,000 feet, and 19
<br />are over 2,000 feet deep. Most of these deep wells flow,
<br />some exceeding 3,000 gallons per minute. In addition to
<br />the large-capacity wells, there are more than 7,000 small-
<br />capacity wells, most of which provide water for domestic
<br />and stock use.
<br />Ground-water withdrawal for recent years averaged
<br />about 750,000 acre-feet per year. Withdrawal by large-
<br />capacity irrigation wells was about 450,000 acre-feet per
<br />year and withdrawal by small-capacity wells was an es-
<br />timated 300,000 acre-feet per year. In 1970 the unconfined
<br />aquifer accounted for 78 percent of the ground water with-
<br />drawn from large-capacity wells. Many of the small capacity
<br />wells are uncontrolled and flow continuously. Perhaps 150,-
<br />000 acre-feet per year from these wells might be considered
<br />waste. It does not contribute to crop production but causes
<br />additional waterlogging.
<br />The annual water use of the valley is substantial. Despite
<br />the abundant supply, water-use practices over the past 100
<br />years have created water problems. Surface-water use has
<br />resulted in the waterlogging of large areas of the valley.
<br />The valley-fill deposits in the northern part of the valley
<br />
<br />r -:":-: ,- n
<br />\j.... NV,.Jf:..
<br />
|