Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'I <br />,. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Pr02ress on u.s. Measures Provided for in Public Law 93-320 <br /> <br />Beginning in late 1995, Mexico raised objections to peaks in salinity at the Northerly International <br />Boundary (NIB) and to the salinity levels in waters delivered at the land boundary. The <br />International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, is addressing these <br />matters through an International Task Force arrangement involving the federal water agencies of <br />each country. The effort is for adjustments in operational practices at those periods where high <br />salinity is a significant problem for Mexico. <br /> <br />Mexico utilizes the treaty waters diverted at Morelos Dam for irrigation and domestic uses in the <br />Mexicali Valley and conveys some of these waters via aqueduct to Tecate and Tijuana. Mexico's <br />concern with an occasional salinity peak comes at those times when Mexico's water delivery <br />demands are low. Beginning in early 1995, the International Task Force exchanged information <br />regarding operations in the United States and Mexico. Salinity readings during 1998 indicate <br />insignificant peaks at this delivery point. <br /> <br />Mexico utilizes some ofthe NIB delivered waters along with water from wells near San Luis, Sonora <br />J~~ ~~!lK!~~_~~aip~g~_ ~l!~e!~u!hat" the United States continues to deliver at the Southerly Land <br />Boundary (SLB). Mexico uses this combInatIon of waters to Imgate 93,86(f acres'ffi -the area onlie <br />Mexicali Valley in Sonora known as the Left Bank unit. Mexico is concerned over reduced crop <br />yields and deteriorating soil quality and increased ground water salinity. In this case also, the <br />International Task Force met several times to exchange information on United States operations and <br />Mexico's management of the delivered waters. Mexico, in this respect, requested that all its treaty <br />deliveries be made at the NIB. This proposal was not practical to the United States in that the <br />United States is not able to prevent all these drainage waters from discharge to Mexico at the SLB <br />and continues to have the right to make these deliveries as part of the treaty volume. Further, this <br />would require release of stored water in the United States that is fully appropriated. Finally, there <br />is the need to better understand the problem in the Mexican irrigation system and all the factors that <br />influence increasing soil and groundwater salinity and lower crop yields. <br /> <br />As a matter of cooperation in the near term, the International Task Force has narrowed the perceived <br />effects to a period of four months of the year and examined scenarios of actions in each country that <br />may be carried out to ameliorate salinity peaks during those periods. The two sides are soon <br />expected to complete internal consultations on feasible alternatives. The United States shall continue <br />to meet its legal obligations as described in Minute 242 by continuing to make the land boundary <br />deliveries with the salinity in the waters customarily delivered at that point. <br /> <br />The Yuma Desalting Plant (YDP) has been off-line since the first part of 1993, when the concrete <br />lining of the Wellton-Mohawk drainage canal was damaged by flood waters from the Gila River. <br />The damages were repaired. <br /> <br />During 1998, the YDP continued to be on standby status while the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation <br />reviewed alternatives for complying with the salinity differ~ntial. <br /> <br />Groundwater <br /> <br />Point 5 of Minute No. 242 provides that: <br /> <br />6 <br />