Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4S'; 3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />18. Comment - Alternates: Minimize health hazards at T~in Lakes by <br />re-routing the main street of the Village (Highway 82) from the <br />main part of town to one block north. <br /> <br />Resp~: Basically the same pollution and sanitary problems <br />~ould exist even though the high~ay were relocated one block <br />north. The Burellu of Reclamation is currently involved in a <br />joint agreement with Forest Service and Lake County for a com- <br />prehensive study of ~ater supply, se~age and solid ~aste disposal, <br />and the development of alternate systems to solve the problem. <br />The present maximum conservation level of 9,200.0 should not have <br />any effects on the present pollution or sanitary situation. <br /> <br />19. <br /> <br />Comment - Alternatives: <br />ne~ operating plans more <br />standards. <br /> <br />Review, re-evaluation and adoption of <br />in keeping with present engineering <br /> <br />Rc-engineering or Project. Recent studies and engineering devel- <br />opments may ~ell have disclosed ne~ methods to more adequately <br />adjust the present needs ~ith preservation and enhancement of <br />the envirorunent. <br /> <br />Response: The Bureau of Reclamation and other cooperating <br />agencies have revie~ed the Project on II continuing basis. The <br />most up-to-date methods and criteria have been and are no~ <br />currently applied with the scope of Project purposes constantly <br />in mind. The volume of studies previously made and the changes <br />~hich have been incorporated into the Project substantiate this <br />statement. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />XI-232b <br /> <br />. <br />