My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07644
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07644
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:29:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.600.20
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Studies - Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/16/1975
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 2 of 2, Pages XI-231 to XI-421
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.- .' .. ""'" <br />~..Jl;;) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Files <br /> <br />Subject: Response to Geological Survey, June 13, 1974, Letter of <br />Comment on the Draft Environmental Statement, Fryingpan- <br />Arkansas Project, Colorado <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1. Comment - Overall, the environmental impacts related to geologic <br />conditions in the project area appear to have been throughly C~n- <br />sidered in the draft statement. However, the description of seismi- <br />city, faulting, and potential earthquake hazards is inadequate <br />(p. 111-63 to 65). There are a number of faults in this part of <br />Colorado that cut Pleistocene sediments and the movement on these <br />faults was too recent for them to be considered inactive. With <br />respect to faulting, the environmental statement (p. 111-65) refers <br />to two U.S. Geological Survey Professional Papers, one by Scott and <br />one by Tweto. Writing of faults that he studied, Scott states: <br />"I believe that future displacement on some of the faults described <br />could result in earthquakes large enough in magnitude to endanger <br />property or people." He concludes his paper by stating that, <br />". . . although the available data are inadequate to permit pre- <br />diction of time of earthquakes in east-central Colorado, the geologic <br />information and seismic record suggest that earthquakes having <br />intensities of IV or less on the modified Mercalli scale will continue <br />as recorded by Simon (1969), and a rare earthquake of intensities VI <br />or VII is probable." <br /> <br />These remarks place a different emphasis on faulting and seismic <br />activity in the project area than is presented in the environmental <br />statement. Re-evaluation of potential impacts of earthquakes and <br />damages that might result in project component failure is suggested. <br /> <br />Response: All major Bureau of Reclamation structures are designed <br />to withstand earthquakes. The exact magnitude or "design earthquake" <br />depends on two factors: the location of the structure in relation <br />to known active faults and the seismic history of the area. Infor- <br />mation concerning these two factors is obtained through detailed <br />field work by USBR geologists working in close cooperation with <br />experts of the USGS. In addition, the "design earthquake" also <br />includes a safety factor. <br /> <br />After obtaining all known available data, a comprehensive analysis <br />is performed on each major structure accocding to the Bureau's <br />publication "Method for Estimating Design Earthquake Rock Motions, ,. <br />dated April 1972. Additional information is available in Chapter III, <br />Section A3c and Chapter IV, Section A2v. <br /> <br />XI-265 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.