Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, ,~ ~~ ,', <br />q...jU' <br /> <br />resource" for recreational purposes except for a physical reduction <br />in the water area to be available for on-water activities. Since <br />construction Ruedi visitations were as follows: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Year Visitor days (12-hour days) y Number of visitors 2/ <br />1970 80,800 279,100 <br />1971 101,800 338,~00 <br />1972 10~,337 3115,611 <br />1973 98,250 266,105 <br /> <br />Between 50 and 60 percent of the visits to Ruedi are for sightseeing. <br />Total on-land activities, plus camping and picnicking, amount to 80 <br />to 90 percent of total Ruedi visits leaving the balance for actual <br />on-water activities. Therefore, the secondary impacts on other <br />reservoirs are anticipated to be minor in terms of absorbing displaced <br />on-water recreationists from Ruedi. All Project reservoirs will <br />experience water fluctuations to meet irrigation, municipal-industrial, <br />hydroelectric power, and minimum flow requirements on both sides of <br />the Continental Divide. There are no reservoirs in the vicinity of <br />Ruedi, The closest are Turquoise Lake, Clear Creek, and Twin Lakes. <br />All are Project features which were considered by the Forest Service <br />and National Park Service in evaluating recreational resources of the <br />Project. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />II. Comment - Also, we note that the statement makes no mention of the <br />proposed Basalt Project just downstream from Ruedi. This proposal <br />would provid~ municipal and domestic water to the rapidly growing <br />Roaring Fork Valley and irrigation water for privately owned ranchettes <br />and farmlands in the area. Much of the water would be made available <br />by storage .r.'~ll2:as~o f::-~::: R~edi ~PRe~voir thus increasing drawdown <br />there. Since operation 'of Basalt could be a contributing factor in <br />an eventual decline of recreation use at Ruedi, discussion of their <br />interrelationship should be included in the final statement. <br /> <br />Response: Ruedi Reservoir was authorized to provide replacement <br />storage for water diverted from the West Slope to the East Slope of <br />Colorado, and to provide water for future developments in western <br />Colorado. As discussed in the preceding response to effectsof draw- <br />down on recreation, the Project authorizing act and the operating <br />principles acknowledged the possible development of the Basalt <br />Project and Project planning considered the use of water stored in <br />Ruedi Reservoir for that purpose. Forest Service planning considered <br />this impact in evaluating the recreational facilities for Ruedi <br />Reservoir. The visitation calculations reflect the utilization of <br />the active conservation pool during the life expectancy of the Project <br />with a possible 200 feet fluctuation of water surface. <br /> <br />XI-246 <br /> <br />1/ Forest Service furnished visitation data in 12-hour days/activity <br />2/ Reclamation converted visitor days to visits per recreation activity. <br />The figures presented are totals. <br /> <br />. <br />