My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07627
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07627
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:29:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.700
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - Homestake Project
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
5/21/1982
Author
US Dept of Ag
Title
Homestake Phase II Project Eagle County Summary of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />34Gt <br /> <br />PURPOSE AND NEED <br /> <br />This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DE IS) has been <br />prepared by the Forest Service in response to an application by the <br />Cities of Colorado Springs and Aurora to construct Phase II of the <br />Homestake trans-mountain water diversion system. An application for <br />an easement has been applied for in accordance with the Forest <br />Service's regulations implementing the Federal Land Policy and <br />Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA, 43 U.S.C. 1761-1771). For detailed <br />information concerning Forest Service authorizing regulations refer to <br />36 CFR 251 (1980). <br />The Cities of Aurora and Colorado Springs have both experienced <br />rapid growth as a direct result of new employment, tourism, and the <br />attractiveness of their locations. During the past decade, annual <br />population growth has approached 10 percent in both locations. The <br />Cities are currently projecting a conservative 3 to 4 percent growth in <br />the years of 1982 to 1995. Even with the conservative growth <br />estimates, the Cities will not be able to meet their anticipated municipal, <br />residentiai, commercial, and industrial water needs without additional <br />water supplies. The Cities forecast that demand will exceed existing <br />water supply around 1994. To provide for contingencies, the Cities <br />wish to have additional water supplies available at least two years <br />before demand requires it, i.e., in late 1991 to early 1992. <br />In 1962, the Cities were decreed numerous water rights in the <br />upper Eagle River basin for diversion by the Homestake Project. The <br />project was initially planned as two separate diversion systems, with <br />Phase I to be located primarily in the Homestake drainage, and Phase II <br />located in the Cross Creek area. <br />Phase i of the Homestake Project was completed in 1967. It <br />consists of diversions on French Creek, Fancy Creek, Missouri Creek, <br />and Sopris Creek, the Fancy-French conduit, the Missouri tunnel, <br />Homestake reservoir, and the Homestake tunnel, which conveys water to <br />Turquoise Lake. These facilities are shown in Figure 2-1. Homestake <br />Phase I currently diverts 28,000 acre-feet of water per year from the <br />Homestake Creek area and was built to accomodate additional water to <br />be delivered to the system by Homestake Phase II. <br />The Homestake Phase II Project is located in central Colorado, <br />primarily in Eagle County i however, direct project effects could extend <br />into Pitkin, Grand, Summit, and Lake Counties (see Figures 2-4 <br />and 1-2). The majority of the project facilities may be located within <br />the White River National Forest. Water is proposed to be diverted <br />primarily from the Cross Creek and Fall Creek drainages, with <br />downstream effects on the Eagle and Colorado Rivers. The principal <br />communities near the project area are Minturn, Red Cliff, Gilman, <br />Leadville, and Vail. <br />As currently submitted, Phase II would not utilize all of the Cities <br />remaining water rights. Additional diversion facilities may be proposed <br />at a later date to utilize these rights. <br />The Phase II expansion has created considerable controversy in <br />that it proposes to construct diversion facilities within the Holy Cross <br />Wilderness as established under Public Law 96-560 on December 22, <br />1980. Section (5) of this law states the following in regards to <br />Homestake water diversions: <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />'. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.