Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3<1'7.L <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />water to its downstream reservoirs. In addition, Blue River water <br />would be pumped in a pipeline from Green Mountain Reservoir to Dillon <br />Reservoir, and then diverted through the existing Robert's Tunnel for <br />delivery to the cities of Aurora and Denver (Figure 2-4). A large <br />reservoir, similar in capacity to Dillon Reservoir, would be constructed <br />in the Eagle River drainage to release water as necessary to satisfy the <br />purposes and uses for which Green Mountain Reservoir water is <br />intended. If implemented, this alternative may eliminate the need for <br />construction of diversion facilities in the Cross Creek-Fall Creek areas; <br />and may possibly eliminate the need for many or all of the Denver Water <br />Departments diversion facilities proposed in the Blue and Eagle river <br />basins. <br />Alternative 5 would result in an average annual water yield to the <br />Cities' of about 41,000 acre-feet, and deliver water at a long-term <br />annual costs of $2,231 per acre-foot (192 percent of the Cities <br />proposal) . <br /> <br />Cities Pro osed Action (Alternative 6 Forest Service Preferred <br />Alternative <br />The development plan proposed by the Cities for the remainder of <br />their Homestake water rights would divert water from the Cross Creek <br />and Fall Creek drainages and transport it to the existing Homestake <br />Reservoir where it would enter the Cities' existing water delivery <br />system (see Figure 2-4 and 2-6). The proposed collection system would <br />consist primarily of underground tunnels connected to surface diversion <br />facilities by riser shafts. <br />Total capital costs for this alternative are estimated at $115,000,000 <br />and annual operating and maintenance costs are estimated at $826,000. <br />With an estimated average' annual water yield of 20,783 acre-feet <br />(designed to meet instream flow criteria), annual long-term cost per <br />acre-foot would be $1,164. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mitigation Measures for Alternatives Considered in Detail <br />The EIS presents the mitigation measures that have been proposed <br />for the Homestake Phase II project, either as mitigations that are part <br />of the alternatives or as mitigations that are suggested but are outside <br />Forest Service authority. Mitigation measures which were suggested or <br />designed by the Cities and are a part of their environmental protection <br />plan as stated in the Cities' Environmental I mpact Report (E I R) and are <br />in compliance with 36 CFR 251.54(e)(4), are identified. Mitigations are <br />grouped by the alternatives that they apply to. Mitigation measures <br />are not requi red for the "No Action" alternative (Alternative 1) and the <br />existing "1962 easement" (Alternative 2) stipulations are in force at this <br />time; therefore, new stipulations cannot be added. I nsufficient data for <br />analysis in the "water trades" alternative (Alternative 5) precludes <br />designing mitigation measures for non-Forest system lands for <br />comparative purposes. Potential mitigation measures that could be <br />implemented by local government agencies other than the Forest Service <br />are disclosed in this DEIS in response to public issues raised during the <br />scoping process. Implementation of these mitigations could be by Eagle <br />County in cooperation with Lake County and the affected towns in the <br />area. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />""- <br />