Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, '.'"t. <br />f;:} <br />rd <br />A.. ! <br /><;~',.fl. <br />J;\'~l <br />, :) <br />,;",j <br /> <br />The FY 1978 appropriation for the project totaled $574,000. As <br />of February, 1978, about one-half of a 42-hole exploration drilling <br />program was completed, which includes permanent observation wells to <br />monitor the confined aquifer. A contract has been prepared to drill <br />and conduct pump tests at five to ten test well locations in the south- <br />ern part of the project area. b re-evaluation of available surfac~ <br />waters for salvage is nearing completion. Land surveys in stages I <br />and II have been completed. <br /> <br />Work presently under way or scheduled for the remainder of this <br />fiscal year includes U. S. Geological Survey aquifer modeling studies; <br />surveys of vegetation and wetlands; land surveys; drilling programs; <br />and engineering studies for development of the Definite Plan Report. <br /> <br />The Administration's budget for FY 1979 includes $500,000 for the <br />Closed Basin Project. Advance planning studies will be continued. <br />The Definite Plan Report and the Praft and Final Environmental Impact <br />Statement are scheduled for completion in FY 1979. <br /> <br />Local SUPPort <br /> <br />There is strong local support for the project. The project is <br />being supported by the Rio Grande Water conservation District, the <br />Conejos Water Conservancy District, the San Luis Valley Water Conser- <br />vancy District, the Rio Grande Water Users Aqsociation, the San Luis <br />Valley Irrigation Well Owners, Inc., and num8xous other organizations <br />and entities. It is a reasonable assumption that at least 90 percent <br />of the water users in the San Luis Valley support the project. <br /> <br />The substantial support which has always existed fOr project <br />construction has increased considerably in recent years. This in- <br />creased support has resulted largely from the unfortunate effects of <br />the pending case of Texas and New Mexico v. Colorado. As a result of <br />this case, the Colorado State Engineer has been forced to curtail <br />water uses in ColOrado. This reduction in wator diversions has caused <br />severe financial hardships, particularly to well owners who for the <br />mOst part have junior decrees. The well owners are now attempting to <br />raise approximately one million dollars to purchase surface water <br />rights to replace the junior water being pumped from wells. If the <br />Closed Basin project were constructed, it would not be necessary for <br />the well owners to bear this heavy financial burden. <br /> <br />Considerable additional support for the project by the valley <br />residents came about through the incorporation of numerous safeguards <br />in the authorizing legislation (P.L. 92-514; 86 Stat. 964), as follows. <br /> <br />1. No project wells, other than observation wells, shall be <br />permitted to penetrate the aquiclude, or first confining clay layer. <br /> <br />2. Construction of any stage of the project after stage one can <br />be undertaken only with the consent of the Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board" and the Rio Grande Water Conservation District. <br /> <br />-3- <br />