My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07593
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:01 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:28:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
9/1/1996
Author
USFS
Title
Aspen Highlands Ski Area - Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Summary
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o(jnfl~ <br /> <br />S"""""", <br /> <br />that about 285 lunch-time diners would use the restaurant each day and possibly hike in the vicinity of, and down <br />from, the restaurant. <br /> <br />POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES <br />In order to limit the number of skiers on Aspen Highlands to 3,480 SAOT, an electronic ticketLing system will <br />be installed to monitor the number of skiers accessing the mountain, a local radio station will inform arriving <br />visitors if the Aspen Highlands parking area is near capacity, and the delivery capacity of initial access lifts and <br />ground transponation servicing the base area could be reduced. Since sununer use of Aspen Highlands is <br />currently very limited. sununer activities proposed under Alternative C would not impact current activities, and <br />no mitigation measures are proposed. <br /> <br />HUMAN HEALTH AND SAFETY. AVALANCHE CONTROL <br /> <br />AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT <br />Aspen Highlands includes steep-sided. avalanche-prone terrain. The continental snow climate experienced in <br />Pitkin County is characterized by cold temperatures and low density snow, which generally result in unstable <br />snowpack. Timing of avalanche activity is often difficult to predict due to persistent deep slab instability. <br />Steeplechase, Highland Bowl, and Marooo Bowl are the main areas of concern for avalanche control. <br /> <br />The Steeplechase area is a wide, easterly facing slope that descends from Loge Peak and the ridgeline to the oorth <br />down to Castle Creek. Individual staning zones and tracks are dermed by stands of timber. In some cases, <br />connecting open spaces may result in two or more small to moderate-sized staning zones releasing <br />simultaneously. While the Steeplechase area presents significant avalanche hazards, the smaller avalanche <br />staning zones and numerous widely distributed "islands of safety" greatly facilitate avalanche management. <br /> <br />Highland Bowl is a steep, primarily east-facing drainage. The upper slopes are steep enough (high 30 to lower <br />40 degrees) for frequent avalanche activity, but not so steep as to prevent a significant accumulation of snow. <br />Thus. avalanche frequency and magnitude varies annually. The release of major ponions of the bowl with <br />avalanche runs to the Sleepy Hollow or mid-track area at 10,000 feet tends to occur once in 3 years. Avalanches <br />that run full-track, where at least a ponion of the debris reaches the valley floor in the vicinity of Castle Creek <br />(at approximately 8,500 feet), may occur as often as once in 10 years. Evidence from tree growth and species <br />distributioo patterns indicate that major avalanche events, which affect vinually all of the avalanche path and <br />which produce large debris deposits on the valley floor, may have a return interval of once in 80 years. Smaller <br />avalanches that could be dangerous or fatal to skiers would be very common. They could occur during any storm <br />where a minimum of 6 inches of snow, accompanied by wind, would be deposited. <br /> <br />As with most upper elevation slopes in this snow climate, the snowpack in Maroon Bowl is usually categorized <br />as structurally weak, especially where there is shallower snowpack on windward slopes. However, considerable <br />differences in snowpack structure and distribution would occur between the northerly and more southerly facing <br />aspects of the bowl. Most of the upper ponions of Maroon Bowl are devoid of timber. The only significant tree <br />cover to be found on the upper slope is a small patch located approximately in the center of the bowl. This <br />general lack of trees indicates that, as with Highland Bowl, it may be possible for much of the upper ponions of <br />this drainage to release at one time in a large avalanche event. The large expanse of upper Maroon Bowl, <br />combined with the steep terrain along the sides of this drainage, suggest that the total area that could release in <br />a single event could be greater than in Highland Bowl. Since the ground surface in the upper bowl is generally <br />fairly smooth, significant avalanche activity may occur even under moderately sha1Iow snowpack conditions. The <br />combination of a steep, wide staning zone with relatively few natural anchors, substantial venical relief, and an <br />inaeasingly confined track: results in large, destructive avalanches that run to Maroon Creek perhaps as often as <br />twice every 5 years. Smaller avalanches that run as far as the 10,OOO-foot level where the track oarrows are most <br />likely a fairly common event. <br /> <br />Section III <br />H"""", Heallh oM Safety - Avalan;;he COnJrol <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.