Laserfiche WebLink
<br />J )2 ~ 0 3 Summary <br />or endangered species were found to occur, no conservation measures required through the USfWS section 7 <br />consultation would be necessary. <br /> <br />BIODIVERSITY <br /> <br />AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT <br />Biodiversity was assessed at both the regional area and analysis area scale. Gamma diversity in the regional area <br />is comprised of the types and patterns of habitats, the linkages and/or barriers between them, and the species <br />found within them. Natural disturbance, urbanization, private land use, construction and maintenance of <br />highways and roads, timber harvest, mining, and recreation have all contributed to the relatively high degree of <br />habitat patchiness in this area. The regional area also encompasses, at least in part, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass <br />and HWlter-Frying Pan wildernesses. Within the regional area, existing migration corridors or linkages for hig <br />game and other species not only provide for a means of transferring genetic material among populations at the <br />regional scale. but may also provide transitional habitat for movement of genes, populations, and communities <br />in response to more global disturbances such as climatic change. <br /> <br />The same factors that gave rise to the community patchiness and fragmentation at the regional scale have also <br />been imponant in shaping biodiversity at the analysis area scale. Because of this patchiness, a diversity of plant. <br />animal. and habitat types has evolved and resulted in a relatively high level of alpha and beta diversity. The <br />existing analysis area is characterized by an assemblage of naturally occurring (e.g.. fIre and avalanche) and <br />anthropogenic (e.g., road construction, commercial and private development) habitat types. The analysis area <br />contains a number of sensitive habitat types including recruitment and potential old growth forest stands. <br />Recruitment stands arc characterized by many of the same attributes as old growth stands but are not old enough <br />to be properly considered old growth. "Potential old growth" refers to stands which appear to have old growth <br />characteristics but detailed stand data is not available for age confmnation. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES <br />bnpacts to biodiversity (including habitat fragmentation and elimination of habitat linkages) would be minor <br />under the No Action Alternative since additional clearing for the already approved developments would lie in <br />or adjacent to existing artifIcial openings. <br /> <br />Under Alternative B, impacts to biodiversity would result mainly from construction of the Steeplechase and <br />Highland Bowl lifts, and the Steeplechase, Highland Bowl and Temerity catwalks. Forest fragmeotation would <br />result in an additional 62 forest patches (19 percent increase) with 92 percent of the increase being 0-5 acre <br />blocks. Tree clearing and revegetation would affect geoetic diversity if exotic plants that out-compete local flora <br />are introduced. In areas where weeds are able to out-compete and eventually dominate the local flora, the native <br />plants are likely to be locally extirpated, thus resulting in a local decrease in the alpha diversity of that area. <br />Glading and/or habitat fragmentation would render remaining habitats unsuitable for certain forest-interior or <br />area sensitive species thereby also impacting alpha diversity. Tree clearing could also affect diversity by altering <br />the ratio of individuals of edge-tolerant/forest-interior species, and reducing habitat evenness. The resulting <br />change in spatial configurations between habitat blocks could impact gamma diversity. <br /> <br />Since most of the forest fragmentation under both Alternative B and C would occur on the east side of Aspen <br />Highlands, and forest fragmentation in Maroon Bowl (which is excluded in Alterative C) would be limited, <br />biodiversity impacts in Alternative C would be similar to those in Alternative B. The oumber of forest patcbes <br />would increase by 63 (20 percent) relative to the No Action Alternative (almost all in the 0-5 acre block size). <br />Alternative C could more severely fragment potential old growth spruce-fIr stands (which tend to harbor more <br />species than young growth) between Highland Bowl and Steeplechase lifts and along the egress route below <br />Steeplechase Lift. Another differmce could be introduction of a more exotic species to revegetate the Ridge and <br />Highland surface lifts. <br /> <br />S~ctioll III <br />Biodiver.sily <br /> <br />23 <br />