Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 8-76. Yields of 'fTI4J'or C1'OP' in the Yuma Valley area, 1966-1978 (tons/acre). <br /> <br /> 196~ 1967 1968 1969 1970 95 Percen t <br /> 1971 1972 1973 Confidence <br />l\.) In terval <br />o:J Cotton 3.32 2.11 3.12 2.49 1.90 2.16 2.09 2.31 2.44 t 0.43a <br />'f Alfalfa 6.00 6.30 5.90 6.80 6.30 6.90 7.30 7.70 6.65 t 0.53 <br />Lettuce 12.67 12.64 7.11 7.63 12.53 9.00 11.04 10.81 10.43 t 1.89 <br />~.J Cantaloupe 5.32 4.75 4.94 570 5.70 8.50 8.10 6.40 6.18 t 1.18 <br /> Wheat 1.62 2.04 2.10 2.01 2.13 1.83 2.19 2.49 2.05 t 0.21 <br /> Sorghum 1.71 2.46 1.5.1 1.26 2.10 1.76 2.13 2.18 1.89 t 0.33 <br /> Grass Seed 9.00 7.30 8.20 6.50 4.80 5.80 5.90 7.80 6.91 t 1.18 <br /> Grapefrui t 1O.26b 16.88b .4.72 7.22b 11.91b 4.94 3.66 2.70 11.57 t 6.43 <br /> Oranges/Tangerines 7.87 6.67 N/A 11.51 10.64 6.84 5.78 6.31 7.95 t 2.07 <br /> Lemons 10.66 t2.83 6.11 5.57 5.26 8.90 t 4.27 <br /> a4SD-pound bales per acre. <br /> bYie1ds considered to be representative of mature trees. <br /> Source. U.S-. Bureau of Reclamation, Water and ,Lan.d Resourc_es Accomplishments, 1966-1973. <br /> <br />being profitable management alternatives. Partial <br />sprinkler, full sprinkler, and tiling were not selected. <br /> <br />Changes in the amounts of production and land <br />use are shown in Table 3.76. Alfalfa, grapefruit, and <br />lemons Jl,re the crops which have both a constant level <br />of production and a constant amount of acres used. <br /> <br />Lettuce, wheat, and sorghum have con~tant <br />levels of production throughout the TDS range. But as <br />yields decline. more land is required when the TDS <br />level increases. The most significant increase occurs in <br />lettuce at the 1300 and 1400 mg/l TDS levels. <br /> <br />An interesting trend develops in the case of <br />cotton, . grass seed, and oranges/tangerines. Both <br />production and land area decline. In the initial run, <br />cotton and oranges/tangerilles are produced at the <br />upper level while grass seed is a slack activity <br />(produced neither at the upper level nor the lower <br />level but somewhere in between). Grass seed <br />production and occupied land area decline until 1300 <br />mg/I TDS is reached. At this level, grass seed has <br />declined to the lower level of the model and so <br />oranges/tangerines decrease in production and land <br />area. However, at 1400 mg/I TDS, the lower limit is <br />reached for oranges/tangerines and cotton incurs a <br />loss in production and land area. Redistribution of <br />these crops occurs due to declining yields of the <br />remaining crops and consequently, more land of better <br />drainage characteristics is required in order to meet <br />their production needs according to the model. <br /> <br />Cantaloupe demonstrates the same kind of <br />allocation pattern as in the previous analysis of the <br />Gila area. In maintaining a constant level of <br />production throughout the TDS range, first, land area <br />increases and then it decreases. For 900 to 1200 mg/I <br />TDS, increased land area is required to maintain a <br />constant level of production. At 1300 mg/l TDS, <br />relative economic trade oils between cantaloupe and <br />the other crops cause more cantaloupe production to <br />be allocated to better land classes. Previously, <br />production was placed on class 1, 2, and 3 lands. Now <br />the model assigned production to class 1 and 2 lands <br /> <br />reaching 1400 mg/I TDS, the model places most of the <br />production on class 1 land. Since a larger share of total <br />production is produced on higher yielding land at 1300 <br />and 1400 mg/l TDS, less land is required, and thus a <br />constant production level can be maintained with <br />lower land use. For more details concerning the <br />interactions of the different crops at the various levels <br />of TDS refer to sub-Appendix H. <br /> <br />Table 3-77 contains the shadow prices of the <br />various land classes. In all land classes, the trend is <br />. toward higher relative values. Evidently demand for <br />the various land classes increased throughout the <br />range causing the values to increase. A significant <br />jump occurs between 1300 and 1400 mg/I TDS where, <br />for. example, the value of class 1 land increases from <br />$190 io $323. Similar jumps occur in the remaining <br />land classes. Double cropped land classes behave <br />somewhat differently and the reader is referred to <br />sub-Appendix H for a more detailed explanation. <br /> <br />The total water constraint established in the <br />model was 270,900 ac ft. This amount is the total <br />av~ilable for agricultural purposes. In Table 8.78, total <br />water consumption appears to be declining in a normal <br />trend until at 1300 and 1400 mg/I TDS sharp <br />decreases are. detected. This is explained by examin- <br />ing the trade offs occurring in cotton, grass seed, and <br />oranges/tangerines. At 1300 mg/I TDS, both land <br />area and production declined for the latter two crops. <br />Since these crops consume water almost year around, <br />large amounts are required as compared to a crop with <br />a shorter season. Due to the fact that less water is <br />needed for these two crops because of less production <br />and smaller occupied land area, overall total consump. <br />tion of water also declines. The same reasoning is <br />applied at the 1400 mg/I TDS level, but instead of <br />grass seed declining, cotton is the. crop which <br />undergoes a loss in production and land area. Along <br />with cotton, oranges/tangerines also decline which <br />precipitates another sharp decrease in the demand for <br />water. <br /> <br />Net profit as estimated by the ",odel objective <br />function coresponding to the different TDS levels, are <br /> <br />174 <br />