Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />III of the Operating Criteria; and (5) whether apportioned but unused water by one <br /> <br />or more Lower Division States exists and can be used to satisfy beneficial <br /> <br />consumptive use requests of mainstream users in other Lower Division States as <br /> <br />provided in the decree in Arizona v. California. <br /> <br />Consistent with the above determinations and in accordance with other provisions <br /> <br /> <br />of 'The Law of the River," the AOP was developed with "appropriate consideration <br /> <br /> <br />of the uses of the reservoirs for all purposes, including flood control, river <br /> <br /> <br />regulation, beneficial consumptive uses, power production, water quality control, <br /> <br /> <br />recreation, enhancement of fish and wildlife, and other environmental factors" <br /> <br /> <br />(Operating Criteria Article 1(2)). <br /> <br />Since the hydrologic conditions of the Colorado River Basin can never be <br /> <br /> <br />completely known in advance, the AOP addresses the operations resulting from <br /> <br /> <br />three different hydrologic scenarios: the probable maximum, most probable, and <br /> <br /> <br />probable minimum reservoir inflow conditions, River operations under the plan are <br /> <br /> <br />modified during the year as runoff predictions are adjusted to reflect existing <br /> <br /> <br />snowpack and climate conditions. <br />