Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />':::> <br />1::'0) <br />c..) <br />W <br />W <br />~ <br /> <br />Consumptive Uses and Losses <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />RESERVOIR AND STOCK POND EVAPORATION <br /> <br />Reservoir evaporation losses are considerable and make up about 8 percent of <br />the total water uses and losses in the study area. A listing of the reservoirs in <br />the study area, including their locations and normal water surface areas, was <br />obtained from a previous BIA report entitled "1985 Survey of Irrigated Land in <br />the Arizona Portion of the Upper Colorado River" and are shown in table 6. <br />Under normal conditions, the lakes are divided into two classes of evaporative <br />surface area: <br /> <br />· Those used primarily for irrigation. <br />. Those used primarily for fisheries and recreational values. <br /> <br />Efforts are made to maintain a nearly full condition and to minimize water <br />surface fluctuations in reservoirs managed for a fishery. Reservoirs used <br />primarily for irrigation experience large fluctuations in water levels and, <br />correspondingly, large variations in surface area. For an "average" year <br />.operating condition, the evaporative surface area of a reservoir used primarily <br />for irrigation was estimated as one-half the water surface area of a full <br />reservoir. The water surface area of a reservoir used primarily for fishing is <br />assumed to be equal to 'the normal water surface area. The stock ponds are <br />assumed to have water surface areas equal to one-third the water surface area <br />that occurs when the ponds are full. For a "dry" year condition like that of <br />year 1990, it was estimated that the water supply was about 50 percent of <br />normal. Therefore, for purposes of this report, the "average" year assumptions <br />were reduced by one-half.. <br /> <br />This method of evaporation estimation was used because continuous useful <br />reservoir level records for all reservoirs from which surface area could be <br />accurately computed were not available. Another factor complicating the <br />estimating procedure is that evaporation rates are not known at the individual <br />reservoirs. For this report, the NOAA Technical Report NWSA 33 "Evaporation <br />Atlas for the Contiguous 48 United States," June 1982, was used to determine <br />the amount of evaporation. It was assumed that any consumptive use by <br />natural vegetation prior to construction of the reservoirs and stock ponds is <br />negligible and, therefore, was not subtracted from reservoir evaporation losses. <br /> <br />The computed values for reservoir and stock pond evaporation for water year <br />1990 are shown in table 6. The total evaporative losses in 1990 are 2,920 <br />(:1:740) with the reservoir and stockpond evaporation uncertainty being <br />estimated as 30 percent each. <br /> <br />· In a conversation with Jerry Gonzales of ses during September 1991, it was estimated that <br />the reservoirs filled to half their nonnal capacity during the 1990 season. It was suggested that <br />a study be done on actual capacities of reservoirs as they have silted in considerably in recent <br />years. <br />