My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07539
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07539
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:47 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:26:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.300
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations - Colorado River Consumptive Uses and Losses Report
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/1991
Title
Consumptive Uses and Losses in the Arizona Portion of the Upper Colorado River Basin for the Water Year 1990
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I Consumptive Uses and Losses 18 <br />I <br /> 0 <br />I '. ) Table 4.-1990 Total irrigated acreage <br />W <br /> W Grass Spring Small <br />I ~ Com' Alfalfa Pasture Grain Vegetable Orchard Total <br /> Project (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) <br />I Chinle AR'encv <br /> Beautiful Valley 60.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 162.0 <br /> Chinle 140.0 20.0 50.0 8.0 2.0 0.5 220.5 <br /> Canyon de Chelly 50.0 10.0 . 5.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 68.0 <br />I Lukachukai 192.0 125.0 25.0 23.0 10.0 4.5 379.5 <br /> Many Farms 375.0 50.0 185.0 5.0 50.0 0.0 665.0 <br /> Nazlini 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 <br /> Red House 12.0 4.0 10.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 26.7 <br />I Round Rock 113.0 50.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 168.2 <br /> Taaile 2.0 40.0 150.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 203.0 <br /> Wheatfields -!!& .ill:!! 206.0 iQ:2 JhQ. Q& ~ <br />I Total 949.0 596.0 636.0 87.0 67.5 7.4 2342.9 <br /> Shil>rock AsrencY <br /> Cove 30.0 2.0 15.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 50.0 <br />I Red Rock Valley 20.0 5.0 5.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 34.0 <br /> Red Rock Mountains 25.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 32.0 <br /> Rock Point 325.0 30.0 60.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 450.0 <br /> Teec Nos Pos 25.0 18.0 13.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 59.0 <br />I Todestani 20.0 5.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 28.0 <br /> Toh Chin Lini 170.0 30.5 5.0 0.0 5.0 1.0 211.5 <br /> Totaoon J!2& -!!& -!!& Q& ..2& .Q& ~ <br />I Total 695.0 95.5 100.0 2.0 52.0 3.5 948.0 <br /> Tuba Citv AlIOncy <br /> Dennehotso 15.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 20.5 <br />I Lees Fef!'Y 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 <br /> Marsh Pass 60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 61.0 <br /> Narrow Canyon 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 50.0 <br /> Navajo Canyon 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 40.0 <br />I Piute Canyon lli.& Q& 0.0 Q& ~ ~ 50.0 <br /> Total 185.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 12.0 22.5 224.5 <br />I Nonprojedir.rigation 100.0 <br /> Grand total 1,829.0 695.5 737.0 89.0 131.5 33.4 3,615.4 <br />I 1 It has been mentioned that some of the acreage planted in corn is actually dryland farmed. Therefore, it should <br /> not be counted ~s irrigation loss. However, as these numbers are not known. for study purposes it will be assumed <br /> that all acreage data refers to irrigated acreage. It is proposed that further investigation may be required by a team <br />I consisting ofBIA, State of Arizona, and Bureau of Reclamation to confirm the actual acreages irrigated versus dryland <br /> farmed. <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.