Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001086 <br /> <br />All-Federal Power Lines Mandatory-:- <br />Colo. Water Board Backs Rural Electric Stand <br /> <br />For the rural electrlcs of Colorado, <br />as well as a number of municipalities <br />and the general public,. the Colorado <br />Water Conservation Board's August 2 <br />endorsement of the all-federal back <br />bone system for the COIOI1\.do Storage <br />Project is of tremendous significance." <br /> <br />The Board not only endorsed the sys- <br />tem recommended by both. Se<:retary <br />Seaton and Secretary Udall, but went <br />on to recommend that the line from <br />Glen Canyon to Slguard, utah, be ex- <br />tended on to fu-e Central Utah project <br />to close tne gap In traJlllmission be. <br />tween generating plants at Glen Can- <br />yon Dam and Flaming' Gorge Dam. <br /> <br />Director Felix Sparks pointed out <br />that Ule Colorado board had made its <br />own independent engineering and ec- <br />onomics analysis in consultation with <br />the Bureau of Reclamation, the private <br />utilltie's and other interested groups. <br />He said the study had been made over <br />a two-year period. <br /> <br />Sole concern of the Boa r d. <br />Sparks laid. b the bnpac1 on Ihe <br />Storage Proled: and the amount of <br />money that would accrue to Ihe <br />Basin Fund for buDding of partici- <br />pating projects. He said the prob- <br /> <br />lem was complicated by determin- <br />..tion of th.. privale ulUities to !igM <br />Ihe consumer power tp.'oups. al- <br />though Ihis bad no beadlig on Ihe <br />Board's study_ <br />Sparks took the allegations made by <br />the five-utility combine as to ilefici- <br />encies or error in the Bureau's figures <br />arid rejected -each as completely inac- <br />curate or entirely without bearing on <br />the central issue. He said, "The incred- <br />ible punch line is that even if the utility <br />allegations were correct, they would <br />show' that the Bureau was wrong by <br />only $2 million over an 86 year period." <br />Tenning utility claims of savings in <br />transmission losses to the public a "$75 <br />million red herring," Sparks went on <br />to point out the "bare-fal:ed proposal" <br />made by ArJzona Public Service Com- <br />pany, one of the five in the l:ombine <br />seeking control of the $1 blWon dollar <br />project, through "tollgate" distribution <br />lines. <br />He said Arizona PSC proposed to <br />charge more for power "not wneeled" <br />than for power actually wheeled. He <br />added they "intend to pocket all of the <br />displacement value." <br />Sparks contended Ihe ullliJies <br />claims of $97 million increase to <br /> <br />:lhe Basin Fund would ac:lually nol <br />amount to "97 C&nts- ~ven If th~y <br />built the lines Ine:' <br />He said the Bureau plan would add <br />$5 million more each year to the Basin <br />Fund than the Utility proposal. <br />It was this accrual to the Basin Flilld , <br />that concerned the Colorado Water <br />Board. They could not vote to throw <br />away $300 million of participating proj~ <br />ect assistance just so the utilities could <br />build the line. <br />Tuming to the utility daims of sav- <br />ings and taxes, Sparks said even if the <br />atllity figures were used the "savings'" <br />would still total less than the over-all <br />cost they admitted as extral:ting from <br />theprojel:t in 86 years. <br />Sparks concluded that the "utiUties <br />have proposed a barrier to such ex- <br />change (of power between various fed- <br />eral projects) necessitating a tollcllarge <br />both way s on power eXl:hange." <br />Worse yet, he said, "The utility system <br />was cleverly planned" to break up the <br />federal 5Y_stem of an integrated grid <br />advantageous to the project, yet give <br />the utility the same advantage of inte- <br />grating their own systems. <br />In shorl. Sparks said.. the utililifl <br /> <br />lire trying 10 obtain Iremendous. <br />but u!ufltld values. from lhe'Stor- <br />age projec:l wi:thout CQU 1;0 them- ' <br />selves. <br />He said it is obvious that Public <br />Service Company of Colorado is in, a <br />bitter fight with the consumer power <br />groups and i3 using the Storage Proj- <br />ect as a front in that fight. To prove <br />his point, Sparks dted the Collbran <br />project controversy started by Public <br />Servll:e in wh.i~h they were refused <br />the right by Colorado Public Utilities <br />Commission to' construl:t a wheeling <br />power line from the Collbran Project <br />to Montrose after a consumer electrk <br />supplier had already begun construc- <br />tion for their customers. Sparks said <br />Publil: Servke is <:ontinuing to fight <br />for the llne "even though it did not <br />serve a single customer in the Mont- <br />rose area." <br />The consumer power tp.'oup ,In <br />Colorado was l"epreaentecl before <br />:lhe water board' hearing by -John <br />Bugas of Colorado U:le. Howlll'd <br />SCOIt of :lhe Colorado Rural Elec- <br />tric Association. and Harold Lae of <br />Midwest Electric: Consumen. Bugas <br />and Scoll abo spoke for Colorado <br />River Basin Conliumen Power., <br /> <br />, <br /> <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />(By 98110nll1 Rural Electric: <br />Cooperative Assn.) <br />Rural Electric: Aids <br />In Flra! RAD Loan <br />WASHINGTON. D. C.-The first loan <br />and the first publil: grant to be made <br />under the n1l:ently passed Area, Re- <br />development Act went this week to' <br />an area where a rurel elet:tric coop- <br />erative provided the Pl'bne leadersblp <br />in getting a new industry to locate .In <br />.a depressed se,ction. <br />. A total of $161J.OIJI} in b'ederal funds <br />was approved under the ARA by .the <br />Department of Commerce for a water <br />system to serve a shirtfal:tory in Gass- <br />ville, Arkansas. The plant will ulti- <br />mately give employment to 1500 people. <br />Another, major factor in the decis.lon <br />pf the Mar-Bax Shirt Co. to, locate in <br />th.e area was the oo-op's low rates, <br />according to tb.e rural 'electrk system's <br />manager, Jack Cochran. The Co-op is <br />North Arkansas Electric of Salem. It <br />will ful:nlsh electrlcity to the new plant. <br />The factory, land, and part of the <br />water system are being financed by <br />~535,OOO which was raised locally <br />through a bond issue. An extra, $160," <br />000 was needed to complete the system. <br />This will come from the Area Re- <br />pevelopment Administration in th.e <br />fOl'm of a loan of $31,000, and a grant <br />of $129,000. The U. S. Department of <br />Agriculture has approved the project <br />an1 has designated the area as eligible <br />for ARA assistance. <br /> <br />.C <br /> <br />Congresl Seb Funds <br />For Rural EI.clrles <br />WASHINGTON, D. C.-Congress in- <br />cluded $245-million far the REA elec- <br />tric loan program for the present fiscal <br />year in its Agrillulture Appropriations <br />bill which it passed this week and sent <br />to the President for his signature, A <br />total of $162-~ mlIllon was authorized <br />for REA telephone loans. <br />The amounts for the REA loan pro- <br />grams were agreed upon at a confer- <br />ence between the House and senate. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />The House version of the bill, passed <br />last month, has provided $195-million <br />in electric loans during the fiscal year <br />which began July 1, and $150-million <br />for the telephone program. The Senate <br />upped electric loans to $245-million, <br />and increased telephone loans to $l62-lh <br />million. <br />Of the totals, $70-million of, the elel:- <br />tric authorization and $30-millioll. of <br />the telephone authorJzation, are ear~ <br />marked as contingency funds. These <br />are reserve funds to be used if needed. <br />With a carryover of $34-miUion, plus <br />$3-million in recisions-loans made last <br />year but cancelled-REA will have <br />$282-million for electric loans this year, <br />The National Rural Electr;ic Coopera- <br />tive Association had asked Congrells for <br />$280-million in new electric funds for <br />REA. This is $3S.mlllion more than <br />Congress finally approved. The Na- <br />tional Telephone Cooperative Associa- <br />tion had asked for $17S-million for <br />telephone loans. <br /> <br />Nonls Honored. By <br />Commemoralive Slamp <br />W ASINGTON, D.C. - "He was <br />the- father of the Tennessee Valley <br />Authority; the co-sponsor along with <br />Senator List"'r 'Hill. and with the <br />present Speaker of the House, Sam <br />Rayburn, of Rural Electrification. <br />To the farmer, the consumer, the ordi- <br />nary citizen, he gave _ the' fruits of a <br />courage-and a sense of-purpose matched <br />by few men who have served in these <br />great Houses of the United States Con- <br />gress." <br />These were the remarks of Clyde T. <br />Ellis, as master of ceremonies at an <br />observance July -11 on the Capitol steps <br />to honor the 100th anniversary of the <br />birth of the late Senator ,George W. <br />Norris. Ellis is general manager of the <br />Nationai Rural Elutric Cooperative <br />Association. <br />On hand for the OCl:asion, during <br />which the dedication of the GfJorge W. <br />Norris Commemorative 4-cent postage <br />stamp took place, were several hun- <br />dred Congressmen, Administration offi- <br />cia]s, and members of the Norris family. <br /> <br />Replies To Crilicism <br />Of TVA New Low Rates <br />WASHINGTON, D. C.-In replying <br />to criticism ofa new low rate for elec- <br />tric power recently announced by TVA, <br />Senator Estes Kefauver of TennessfJe <br />this week pointed out, "In these days <br />when a price l:ut is about as rare as a <br />July blizzard in Washington, sUl:h a <br />move by this great Federal agency <br />ou.g~t. to be ~e l:ause for widespread <br />reJOll:lng... . <br />"Very probably there is rejoicing by <br />the farmers, the housewives and the <br /> <br />. , ,~ <br /> <br /> <br />YOU'VE GOT TO KEEP TELLING 'EM <br />(From Tennessee Magazine) <br />What the co-op leaa.er!rom Arkansas <br />told the l:O-Op leaders of Tennessee can <br />'be summarized like this: <br />"Comrrumicating with your members <br />is a continuing task. It cannot be done <br />once and say 'This is it;' nor can it be <br />done once each year. , , It Is a con- <br />tinuingjob." <br />This was Walter Nesbitt of Salem, a <br />director of North Arkansas Electric Co~' <br />operative, addressing. the Tennessee <br />Rural Electric Cooperative Association. <br />Warning that 'the danger period for <br />co-operatives comes with the third gen- <br />eration of members," Mr. Nesbitt said <br />"We'd better teU our members about <br />their business. To communicate with <br />our members we need to budget time <br />and money." <br />He praised The Tennessee Magazine, <br /> <br />operators of smaller industrial plants <br />served by TVA power." <br />The Senator noted, however, some of <br />the private utilities and their spokes- <br />men "do not appear to share this joy." <br />He referred to articles in the New York <br />Times and Wall Street Journal which <br />"]oudly ridiculed" the new TV A rate <br />sl:hedule. <br />"They' (the private utility interests) <br />simply trotted out all of the old distor- <br />tions and falsehoods which have dogged <br />TV A since its founding in 1933 and <br />whil:h have been discredited time and <br />again by those who prefer the facts." <br />Kefauver said that TV A over the <br />years has earned an average of 4 per <br />cent on its power operations and that <br />it is paying back the government's in- <br />vestment in its power facilJties ahead <br />of schedule. <br />The Senator observed that a study <br />made a few years ago showed "that the <br />nearer a private utility is to the TV A <br />area, the lower its rates and the higher <br />its fJarnings are IJkely to be. Thus, the <br />TVA yardstick has operated as a com- <br />petitive factor benefitting both private <br />utilities and their customers every- <br />where." <br />TVA sells wholesale power to these <br />distributors which, in turn, sell it to <br />their consumers at rates agreed upon <br />by TVA. The new l"ate may be placed <br />in effect at the option of the distribu. <br />lion systems which serve 1.5 millioh, <br />customers in an 80,0(10 square-mile area. <br /> <br />"your own state~ide publication,. ,a. <br />greai educational and informational <br />service; a great aid to your program';' a <br />mighty force all for pennies per mem~ <br />ber per year." <br />Turning to the field of legislation, Mr. <br />Nesbitt said "we have many good <br />friends under the capitol dome, in Little <br />Rock, in Washington, in Nashville but <br />1 am also painfully aware that rural <br />America's shrinking and urban Amer- <br />ica is expanding, and we are going to be <br />dependent as never before on the fair- <br />ness and the lnfonnation of urbal,l' ' <br />dwellers and urban -lawmakers. ,< . <br />"We must communicate 'with'- '6\1r <br />members that they may commWllcate <br />with theil" city friends and city _ kin- <br />folk. These city folks must be told that <br />the price of beef on the hoof .isn't what <br />makes sirloin so dear; they must be told <br />'that river development is not squan- <br />dering the taxpayers' moner and that <br />the REA program is not a subsidy." <br />"When a oo--operativefaces the threat <br />of a sell-out," Mr. Nesbitt warned, ~lt's <br />always a co operative strong finandally <br />but with the poorest record of com- <br />munil:ating with its members. . . " <br /> <br />COLORADO <br />RURAL ELECTRIC NEWS <br /> <br />Vol. 9. No. 11 <br /> <br />August, 1961 <br /> <br />Editor... <br />MonogingEditor <br />Associote Editor <br /> <br />.Howord E. Scott <br />....Lyle I.. Mor;ner <br />.,........Terry Moriner <br /> <br />Editorial ond Business Offlce <br />802 Formers Union <br />Denver 3. Colorodo <br />Telephone KE 4.0139 <br />PUBLISHED MONTHLY <br />by the Colo","o Stote <br />Ru...1 Eleetrle Ass""latlon <br />"'d"ho,y, Stol. "..1,,"11' w..... 8y.... F,u~o, Slclo <br />,.I''''''ll_' Howo,dE. S""H. T.l...hon. KEy.Io...4.C1S9. <br />S02fo,m."lInlonSldg..l.il7.5Sh.""..nSI..Don"e,3. <br />Colo. <br />t<.bll,otlon Cornml~, lurh., Wllkl.... Chobm..n. <br />Ak,o:h, Rolph M<Mi/I..n, ColofGdo 5p,lnllSl Lewr. <br />~~:g'l.,.....~mR".:y CViff;o~,t)'.(.~I~,...EII7IOl KueRr; <br />'1110 Colo.ockl Il"'..lllecl.lc H.OWI Is ""'n.... <br />~~~~~:. r..n~h:!'i'::'':.~ :J ::"'......~~e,:t.la piev- <br />",.. of rurar ........ sp""ltl."lly ud tho 0"'1,; <br />pop"IIl'klnofColorodoondth.....lloo_"'. <br /> <br />f::n~~:::t.:.ol::~ ':"'=~$1.G:. Vo".1m:~~"'i",; <br />...II\{l'onn3579odllrustoC.I.....ckIR...1 <br />EII.tde Hows, loa 'arm"", Union BleIg.. ......... <br />3, Colo. fr>1o..d al Second CIIl.. M..tt.r ,,' U.. <br />,.st Oftko of Doo""..C.lo.. un.r oct of Moreh <br />3.1179. <br /> <br />Member Nolianal Rurol EI.ol,;o U>operotive <br />P,...Asso<:lotlon . <br /> <br />""""IAn <br />member <br />u@rnu <br /> <br />OLORADO...a:--, <br />D kESS A'SSCKIAtlON <br /> <br />1040110001 AdYOrtlsl", R......""'tIYa lI.wol <br />EI_kCo.........'l'Iibl'"'tl.....51...ho>l!B~ <br />~~~~Ia:" ~ StL..:r~I::...:u Dc~ior~-IfR~:::I <br />Eloctrk~....~02...."'.I'IUIII...Bld...DeIl_ <br />..Col.....d.. <br /> <br />