<br />001086
<br />
<br />All-Federal Power Lines Mandatory-:-
<br />Colo. Water Board Backs Rural Electric Stand
<br />
<br />For the rural electrlcs of Colorado,
<br />as well as a number of municipalities
<br />and the general public,. the Colorado
<br />Water Conservation Board's August 2
<br />endorsement of the all-federal back
<br />bone system for the COIOI1\.do Storage
<br />Project is of tremendous significance."
<br />
<br />The Board not only endorsed the sys-
<br />tem recommended by both. Se<:retary
<br />Seaton and Secretary Udall, but went
<br />on to recommend that the line from
<br />Glen Canyon to Slguard, utah, be ex-
<br />tended on to fu-e Central Utah project
<br />to close tne gap In traJlllmission be.
<br />tween generating plants at Glen Can-
<br />yon Dam and Flaming' Gorge Dam.
<br />
<br />Director Felix Sparks pointed out
<br />that Ule Colorado board had made its
<br />own independent engineering and ec-
<br />onomics analysis in consultation with
<br />the Bureau of Reclamation, the private
<br />utilltie's and other interested groups.
<br />He said the study had been made over
<br />a two-year period.
<br />
<br />Sole concern of the Boa r d.
<br />Sparks laid. b the bnpac1 on Ihe
<br />Storage Proled: and the amount of
<br />money that would accrue to Ihe
<br />Basin Fund for buDding of partici-
<br />pating projects. He said the prob-
<br />
<br />lem was complicated by determin-
<br />..tion of th.. privale ulUities to !igM
<br />Ihe consumer power tp.'oups. al-
<br />though Ihis bad no beadlig on Ihe
<br />Board's study_
<br />Sparks took the allegations made by
<br />the five-utility combine as to ilefici-
<br />encies or error in the Bureau's figures
<br />arid rejected -each as completely inac-
<br />curate or entirely without bearing on
<br />the central issue. He said, "The incred-
<br />ible punch line is that even if the utility
<br />allegations were correct, they would
<br />show' that the Bureau was wrong by
<br />only $2 million over an 86 year period."
<br />Tenning utility claims of savings in
<br />transmission losses to the public a "$75
<br />million red herring," Sparks went on
<br />to point out the "bare-fal:ed proposal"
<br />made by ArJzona Public Service Com-
<br />pany, one of the five in the l:ombine
<br />seeking control of the $1 blWon dollar
<br />project, through "tollgate" distribution
<br />lines.
<br />He said Arizona PSC proposed to
<br />charge more for power "not wneeled"
<br />than for power actually wheeled. He
<br />added they "intend to pocket all of the
<br />displacement value."
<br />Sparks contended Ihe ullliJies
<br />claims of $97 million increase to
<br />
<br />:lhe Basin Fund would ac:lually nol
<br />amount to "97 C&nts- ~ven If th~y
<br />built the lines Ine:'
<br />He said the Bureau plan would add
<br />$5 million more each year to the Basin
<br />Fund than the Utility proposal.
<br />It was this accrual to the Basin Flilld ,
<br />that concerned the Colorado Water
<br />Board. They could not vote to throw
<br />away $300 million of participating proj~
<br />ect assistance just so the utilities could
<br />build the line.
<br />Tuming to the utility daims of sav-
<br />ings and taxes, Sparks said even if the
<br />atllity figures were used the "savings'"
<br />would still total less than the over-all
<br />cost they admitted as extral:ting from
<br />theprojel:t in 86 years.
<br />Sparks concluded that the "utiUties
<br />have proposed a barrier to such ex-
<br />change (of power between various fed-
<br />eral projects) necessitating a tollcllarge
<br />both way s on power eXl:hange."
<br />Worse yet, he said, "The utility system
<br />was cleverly planned" to break up the
<br />federal 5Y_stem of an integrated grid
<br />advantageous to the project, yet give
<br />the utility the same advantage of inte-
<br />grating their own systems.
<br />In shorl. Sparks said.. the utililifl
<br />
<br />lire trying 10 obtain Iremendous.
<br />but u!ufltld values. from lhe'Stor-
<br />age projec:l wi:thout CQU 1;0 them- '
<br />selves.
<br />He said it is obvious that Public
<br />Service Company of Colorado is in, a
<br />bitter fight with the consumer power
<br />groups and i3 using the Storage Proj-
<br />ect as a front in that fight. To prove
<br />his point, Sparks dted the Collbran
<br />project controversy started by Public
<br />Servll:e in wh.i~h they were refused
<br />the right by Colorado Public Utilities
<br />Commission to' construl:t a wheeling
<br />power line from the Collbran Project
<br />to Montrose after a consumer electrk
<br />supplier had already begun construc-
<br />tion for their customers. Sparks said
<br />Publil: Servke is <:ontinuing to fight
<br />for the llne "even though it did not
<br />serve a single customer in the Mont-
<br />rose area."
<br />The consumer power tp.'oup ,In
<br />Colorado was l"epreaentecl before
<br />:lhe water board' hearing by -John
<br />Bugas of Colorado U:le. Howlll'd
<br />SCOIt of :lhe Colorado Rural Elec-
<br />tric Association. and Harold Lae of
<br />Midwest Electric: Consumen. Bugas
<br />and Scoll abo spoke for Colorado
<br />River Basin Conliumen Power.,
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />
<br />It
<br />
<br />(By 98110nll1 Rural Electric:
<br />Cooperative Assn.)
<br />Rural Electric: Aids
<br />In Flra! RAD Loan
<br />WASHINGTON. D. C.-The first loan
<br />and the first publil: grant to be made
<br />under the n1l:ently passed Area, Re-
<br />development Act went this week to'
<br />an area where a rurel elet:tric coop-
<br />erative provided the Pl'bne leadersblp
<br />in getting a new industry to locate .In
<br />.a depressed se,ction.
<br />. A total of $161J.OIJI} in b'ederal funds
<br />was approved under the ARA by .the
<br />Department of Commerce for a water
<br />system to serve a shirtfal:tory in Gass-
<br />ville, Arkansas. The plant will ulti-
<br />mately give employment to 1500 people.
<br />Another, major factor in the decis.lon
<br />pf the Mar-Bax Shirt Co. to, locate in
<br />th.e area was the oo-op's low rates,
<br />according to tb.e rural 'electrk system's
<br />manager, Jack Cochran. The Co-op is
<br />North Arkansas Electric of Salem. It
<br />will ful:nlsh electrlcity to the new plant.
<br />The factory, land, and part of the
<br />water system are being financed by
<br />~535,OOO which was raised locally
<br />through a bond issue. An extra, $160,"
<br />000 was needed to complete the system.
<br />This will come from the Area Re-
<br />pevelopment Administration in th.e
<br />fOl'm of a loan of $31,000, and a grant
<br />of $129,000. The U. S. Department of
<br />Agriculture has approved the project
<br />an1 has designated the area as eligible
<br />for ARA assistance.
<br />
<br />.C
<br />
<br />Congresl Seb Funds
<br />For Rural EI.clrles
<br />WASHINGTON, D. C.-Congress in-
<br />cluded $245-million far the REA elec-
<br />tric loan program for the present fiscal
<br />year in its Agrillulture Appropriations
<br />bill which it passed this week and sent
<br />to the President for his signature, A
<br />total of $162-~ mlIllon was authorized
<br />for REA telephone loans.
<br />The amounts for the REA loan pro-
<br />grams were agreed upon at a confer-
<br />ence between the House and senate.
<br />
<br />J
<br />
<br />The House version of the bill, passed
<br />last month, has provided $195-million
<br />in electric loans during the fiscal year
<br />which began July 1, and $150-million
<br />for the telephone program. The Senate
<br />upped electric loans to $245-million,
<br />and increased telephone loans to $l62-lh
<br />million.
<br />Of the totals, $70-million of, the elel:-
<br />tric authorization and $30-millioll. of
<br />the telephone authorJzation, are ear~
<br />marked as contingency funds. These
<br />are reserve funds to be used if needed.
<br />With a carryover of $34-miUion, plus
<br />$3-million in recisions-loans made last
<br />year but cancelled-REA will have
<br />$282-million for electric loans this year,
<br />The National Rural Electr;ic Coopera-
<br />tive Association had asked Congrells for
<br />$280-million in new electric funds for
<br />REA. This is $3S.mlllion more than
<br />Congress finally approved. The Na-
<br />tional Telephone Cooperative Associa-
<br />tion had asked for $17S-million for
<br />telephone loans.
<br />
<br />Nonls Honored. By
<br />Commemoralive Slamp
<br />W ASINGTON, D.C. - "He was
<br />the- father of the Tennessee Valley
<br />Authority; the co-sponsor along with
<br />Senator List"'r 'Hill. and with the
<br />present Speaker of the House, Sam
<br />Rayburn, of Rural Electrification.
<br />To the farmer, the consumer, the ordi-
<br />nary citizen, he gave _ the' fruits of a
<br />courage-and a sense of-purpose matched
<br />by few men who have served in these
<br />great Houses of the United States Con-
<br />gress."
<br />These were the remarks of Clyde T.
<br />Ellis, as master of ceremonies at an
<br />observance July -11 on the Capitol steps
<br />to honor the 100th anniversary of the
<br />birth of the late Senator ,George W.
<br />Norris. Ellis is general manager of the
<br />Nationai Rural Elutric Cooperative
<br />Association.
<br />On hand for the OCl:asion, during
<br />which the dedication of the GfJorge W.
<br />Norris Commemorative 4-cent postage
<br />stamp took place, were several hun-
<br />dred Congressmen, Administration offi-
<br />cia]s, and members of the Norris family.
<br />
<br />Replies To Crilicism
<br />Of TVA New Low Rates
<br />WASHINGTON, D. C.-In replying
<br />to criticism ofa new low rate for elec-
<br />tric power recently announced by TVA,
<br />Senator Estes Kefauver of TennessfJe
<br />this week pointed out, "In these days
<br />when a price l:ut is about as rare as a
<br />July blizzard in Washington, sUl:h a
<br />move by this great Federal agency
<br />ou.g~t. to be ~e l:ause for widespread
<br />reJOll:lng... .
<br />"Very probably there is rejoicing by
<br />the farmers, the housewives and the
<br />
<br />. , ,~
<br />
<br />
<br />YOU'VE GOT TO KEEP TELLING 'EM
<br />(From Tennessee Magazine)
<br />What the co-op leaa.er!rom Arkansas
<br />told the l:O-Op leaders of Tennessee can
<br />'be summarized like this:
<br />"Comrrumicating with your members
<br />is a continuing task. It cannot be done
<br />once and say 'This is it;' nor can it be
<br />done once each year. , , It Is a con-
<br />tinuingjob."
<br />This was Walter Nesbitt of Salem, a
<br />director of North Arkansas Electric Co~'
<br />operative, addressing. the Tennessee
<br />Rural Electric Cooperative Association.
<br />Warning that 'the danger period for
<br />co-operatives comes with the third gen-
<br />eration of members," Mr. Nesbitt said
<br />"We'd better teU our members about
<br />their business. To communicate with
<br />our members we need to budget time
<br />and money."
<br />He praised The Tennessee Magazine,
<br />
<br />operators of smaller industrial plants
<br />served by TVA power."
<br />The Senator noted, however, some of
<br />the private utilities and their spokes-
<br />men "do not appear to share this joy."
<br />He referred to articles in the New York
<br />Times and Wall Street Journal which
<br />"]oudly ridiculed" the new TV A rate
<br />sl:hedule.
<br />"They' (the private utility interests)
<br />simply trotted out all of the old distor-
<br />tions and falsehoods which have dogged
<br />TV A since its founding in 1933 and
<br />whil:h have been discredited time and
<br />again by those who prefer the facts."
<br />Kefauver said that TV A over the
<br />years has earned an average of 4 per
<br />cent on its power operations and that
<br />it is paying back the government's in-
<br />vestment in its power facilJties ahead
<br />of schedule.
<br />The Senator observed that a study
<br />made a few years ago showed "that the
<br />nearer a private utility is to the TV A
<br />area, the lower its rates and the higher
<br />its fJarnings are IJkely to be. Thus, the
<br />TVA yardstick has operated as a com-
<br />petitive factor benefitting both private
<br />utilities and their customers every-
<br />where."
<br />TVA sells wholesale power to these
<br />distributors which, in turn, sell it to
<br />their consumers at rates agreed upon
<br />by TVA. The new l"ate may be placed
<br />in effect at the option of the distribu.
<br />lion systems which serve 1.5 millioh,
<br />customers in an 80,0(10 square-mile area.
<br />
<br />"your own state~ide publication,. ,a.
<br />greai educational and informational
<br />service; a great aid to your program';' a
<br />mighty force all for pennies per mem~
<br />ber per year."
<br />Turning to the field of legislation, Mr.
<br />Nesbitt said "we have many good
<br />friends under the capitol dome, in Little
<br />Rock, in Washington, in Nashville but
<br />1 am also painfully aware that rural
<br />America's shrinking and urban Amer-
<br />ica is expanding, and we are going to be
<br />dependent as never before on the fair-
<br />ness and the lnfonnation of urbal,l' '
<br />dwellers and urban -lawmakers. ,< .
<br />"We must communicate 'with'- '6\1r
<br />members that they may commWllcate
<br />with theil" city friends and city _ kin-
<br />folk. These city folks must be told that
<br />the price of beef on the hoof .isn't what
<br />makes sirloin so dear; they must be told
<br />'that river development is not squan-
<br />dering the taxpayers' moner and that
<br />the REA program is not a subsidy."
<br />"When a oo--operativefaces the threat
<br />of a sell-out," Mr. Nesbitt warned, ~lt's
<br />always a co operative strong finandally
<br />but with the poorest record of com-
<br />munil:ating with its members. . . "
<br />
<br />COLORADO
<br />RURAL ELECTRIC NEWS
<br />
<br />Vol. 9. No. 11
<br />
<br />August, 1961
<br />
<br />Editor...
<br />MonogingEditor
<br />Associote Editor
<br />
<br />.Howord E. Scott
<br />....Lyle I.. Mor;ner
<br />.,........Terry Moriner
<br />
<br />Editorial ond Business Offlce
<br />802 Formers Union
<br />Denver 3. Colorodo
<br />Telephone KE 4.0139
<br />PUBLISHED MONTHLY
<br />by the Colo","o Stote
<br />Ru...1 Eleetrle Ass""latlon
<br />"'d"ho,y, Stol. "..1,,"11' w..... 8y.... F,u~o, Slclo
<br />,.I''''''ll_' Howo,dE. S""H. T.l...hon. KEy.Io...4.C1S9.
<br />S02fo,m."lInlonSldg..l.il7.5Sh.""..nSI..Don"e,3.
<br />Colo.
<br />t<.bll,otlon Cornml~, lurh., Wllkl.... Chobm..n.
<br />Ak,o:h, Rolph M<Mi/I..n, ColofGdo 5p,lnllSl Lewr.
<br />~~:g'l.,.....~mR".:y CViff;o~,t)'.(.~I~,...EII7IOl KueRr;
<br />'1110 Colo.ockl Il"'..lllecl.lc H.OWI Is ""'n....
<br />~~~~~:. r..n~h:!'i'::'':.~ :J ::"'......~~e,:t.la piev-
<br />",.. of rurar ........ sp""ltl."lly ud tho 0"'1,;
<br />pop"IIl'klnofColorodoondth.....lloo_"'.
<br />
<br />f::n~~:::t.:.ol::~ ':"'=~$1.G:. Vo".1m:~~"'i",;
<br />...II\{l'onn3579odllrustoC.I.....ckIR...1
<br />EII.tde Hows, loa 'arm"", Union BleIg.. .........
<br />3, Colo. fr>1o..d al Second CIIl.. M..tt.r ,,' U..
<br />,.st Oftko of Doo""..C.lo.. un.r oct of Moreh
<br />3.1179.
<br />
<br />Member Nolianal Rurol EI.ol,;o U>operotive
<br />P,...Asso<:lotlon .
<br />
<br />""""IAn
<br />member
<br />u@rnu
<br />
<br />OLORADO...a:--,
<br />D kESS A'SSCKIAtlON
<br />
<br />1040110001 AdYOrtlsl", R......""'tIYa lI.wol
<br />EI_kCo.........'l'Iibl'"'tl.....51...ho>l!B~
<br />~~~~Ia:" ~ StL..:r~I::...:u Dc~ior~-IfR~:::I
<br />Eloctrk~....~02...."'.I'IUIII...Bld...DeIl_
<br />..Col.....d..
<br />
<br />
|