Laserfiche WebLink
<br />QDI7i:. <br /> <br />centrations at various downstream locations for a <br />contaminant discharged or spilled upstream. <br />Traveltime and unit concentrations for a range of <br />stream-discharge conditions were estimated using <br />the measured data and a mathematical model <br />described by McQuivey and Keefer (1976). The <br />simulation of traveltime and unit-concentration <br />data involves initially calibrating the model for the <br />observed data and then simulating results to other <br />flow conditions. Cumulative traveltime and unit- <br />concentration relationships can then be derived for <br />any stream reaches at any assumed discharge <br />(Bauer and others, 1979). Traveltime simulations <br />for the Little Snake River using the model-analysis <br />scheme were compared and agreed within 5 percent <br />of I. he measured medium-flow data for May 1977. A <br />similar comparison also was made for the unit- <br />concentration data. with agreement within 30 to 40 <br />percent. Traveltime simulations based on linear- <br />regression relationships of mean stream velocity or <br />discharge also are given for both streams (Bauer <br />and others, 1979). Longitudinal-dispersion coef- <br />ficients. computed for the Yampa and the Little <br />Snake Rivers, ranged from 6.050 to 400 ft'/s (560 to <br />37 m'/s) for the two streams. <br />As an example of an application of the derived <br />traveltime information, assume that an accidental <br />spill occurred in the Steamboat Springs area in <br />which 1,000 pounds (453 kg) of a soluble conser- <br />vative contaminant was spilled into the Yampa <br />River. Assume a stream discharge at Steamboat <br />Springs (fig. 2) of 1,000 ft'/s (28 m3/s). One im- <br />mediate concern might be to determine the arrival <br />time and peak concentration of this contaminant <br />at the Hayden water plant downstream. At this <br />discharge, the traveltime of the leading edge of the <br />conservative contaminant could be expected to ar- <br />rive at Hayden in approximately 12.5 hours. The <br />estimated peak concentration would be 1,580 f.Lg/L <br />at Hayden, 15.7 hours after the spill (Bauer and <br />others. 1979). Health standards for a particular <br />contaminant would indicate the potential toxic ef- <br />fects of such a concentration and dictate whether or <br />not the water use should be curtailed. <br />In conclusion, prediction of travel rates and <br />dispersion in streams is important for pollution <br />control and for use as a warning system in case of <br />contaminant spillage upstream from critical water- <br />use diversion points. The technique described <br />above provides a means of estimating stream- <br /> <br />travel rates and unit concentrations for a large <br />range in flow conditions, based on one field- <br />sampling study. In cases where no traveltime <br />studies can be made, a regional regression <br />relationship may be used (Boning, 1974). <br />In order to meet projected future demands for <br />water, considerable interest has been expressed <br />and plans proposed for additional development of <br />surface waters of the Yampa River basin. As in- <br />dicated by Maddock and Matalas (1980), some of <br />the future water demands involve year-round use <br />for cooling systems in coal-conversion facilities. <br />Also, anticipated population growth results in in- <br />creased household and service-related water de- <br />mands. Streamflow in the basin presently is <br />regulated by few reservoir impoundments. Thirty- <br />five major reservoirs with storage capacities larger <br />than 2.000 acre-ft (2.5 million m3) have been <br />proposed as part of 18 surface-water projects <br />(Steele, 1980), The total potential reservoir <br />capacity is approximately 2.2 million acre-ft (2,7 <br />billion m'), which is 41 percent more than the <br />mean annual outflow from the basin. Feasibility <br />and planning reports for several of the proposed <br />reservoirs have been prepared (Oak Creek Power <br />Co.. 1976; U.S. Department of the Interior. 1976b). <br />Two projects to export substantial amounts of <br />water for use outside the basin also have been <br />proposed. These include the Vidler Tunnel diver- <br />sion involving tributaries of the Yampa River and <br />the Hog Park diversion involving tributariea of the <br />Little Snake River (fig. 2). <br />Within this particular investigation. three <br />modeling efforts were conducted interactively as a <br />demonstrat.ion study to evaluate various aspects of <br />proposed reservoir development and the tran- <br />smountain diversions (D. B. Adams, 0, P. Bauer, <br />R. H. Dale, and T. D. Steele, written commun.. <br />1978). A reservoir-system model, HEC-3 (U.S. <br />Army Corps of Engineers, 1968). was used to <br />analyze effects on streamflow of alternative reser- <br />voir configurations described below. A river- <br />salinity model (Ribbens. 1975) was used to es- <br />timate dissolved-solids concentrations at selected <br />locations in the basin for the different reservoir <br />configurations. A third model, using the <br />streamflow and water-quality information <br />provided in part by the first two models, evaluated <br />inreservoir water temperatures and specific- <br />conductance conditions at selected sites for as- <br /> <br />29 <br />