My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07510
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07510
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:40 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:26:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1981
Author
USGS
Title
Assessments of Impacts of Proposed Coal-Resource and Related Economic Development on Water Resources - Yampa River Basin - Colorado and Wyoming - A Summary - 1981
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Oll11ft <br /> <br />tion' on each study is documented in reports as in- <br />dicated in the discussion. <br />The analysis" of -the waste-load assimilative <br />capacity indicated that concentrations of non- <br />ionized ammonia nitrogen in the Yampa River <br />from Steamboat Springs to Hayden (fig. 2) mayex- <br />ceed the State's proposed stream standards of 0.2 <br />mg/L on peak-population days (Bauer and others. <br />1978). The computed concentrations were based on <br />population projections for the year 2010 derived <br />from several planning studies (Gathers and As- <br />sociates, Inc.. 1976; U.S. Environmental Protection <br />Agency, 1977). December and September <br />streamflow conditions and different population <br />projections for 2010 were considered (Bauer and <br />others, 1978). <br />Several major factors-for example, existing <br />stream-reach classifications for aquatic life, sug- <br />gested standards for effluent from a proposed <br />regional wastewater-treatment plant, and Steam- <br />boat Springs area population projections-were <br />considered in the model simulations. For the <br />model-simulation phase, it was assumed that all <br />water-quality variables conaidered by the model <br />were only temperature dependent. For example, <br />the simulation for December basically assumed the <br />same biologic and pH conditions as assumed for <br />September, which introduced some degree of un- <br />certainty into the model-simulation results. <br />Nonionized ammonia concentrations were com- <br />puted separately. with due consideration given to <br />prevailing conditions of temperature as well as pH. <br />Concentrations of non ionized ammonia deter- <br />mined from computed ammonia concentrations ex- <br />ceeded the proposed State standard for existing <br />wastewater-treatment-plant effluent when 7-day <br />low flows with a 1O-year recurrence interval (Q7,1O) <br />of 28 ft'ls (0.9 m'/s) were assumed (fig. 6). Possible <br />augmented flows of 20 ft'ls (0.6 m'/s) released from <br />a proposed upstream reservoir such as the Yamcolo <br />Reservoir (fig, 2) would reduce the in-stream ef- <br />fects of wastewater-treatment-plant effluents (fig, <br />6). The fraction of ammonia nitrogen that exists in <br />nonionized form increases with increasing pH. <br />When pH exceeds 8.5, nonionized-ammonia con- <br />centrations may become great enough to be toxic to <br />fish (Willingham, 1976). <br />Stream-reaeration coefficients also were com- <br />puted for several reaches of the Ya mpa River <br />between Steamboat Springs and Hayden, Colo. <br /> <br />(Bauer and others, 1979). Reaeration, the physical <br />absorption of oxygen from the atmosphere, is the <br />primary process by which a stream replaces the <br />oxygen consumed in the biodegradation of organic <br />wastes. For the reaeration-coefficient computation <br />procedure, ethylene and propane were used as <br />tracer gases and rhodamine-WT dye was used as <br />dispersion tracer. The basic premise of the <br />reaeration-coefficient computation is that the ratio <br />of the rate coefficient for a tracer gas desorbing <br />from water to the rate coefficient for oxygen being <br />absorbed by the same water is a constant and is in- <br />dependent of mixing and water temperature. <br />Measured reaeration coefficients, adjusted to 20oC. <br />range from 33.4 to 6.04 d-1 for the stream reaches. <br />These direct measurements were then compared <br />with coefficients computed using several semiem- <br />pirical and empirical functions (Bauer and others, <br />1979). <br /> <br />The model used for the waste-load assimilative- <br />capacity analysis similarly could be used in other <br />stream reaches in which steady-state assumptions <br />of streamflow and waste inputs are acceptable. <br />Steady-state assumptions may be acceptable in <br />many situations. particularly when the focus of a <br />study is on critical-flow conditions, usually as- <br />sociated with low-flow periods for a given stream. <br /> <br />A semiempirical reaeration-rate formula by <br />Tsivoglou and Neal (1976) compared the closest to <br />the measured reaeration data for the Yampa River. <br />A technique described by Bennett and Rathbun <br />(1972) was used for the earlier waste-load <br />assimilative-capacity analysis (Bauer and others, <br />1978). The amount of error difference because of <br />the use of the Bennett and Rathbun (1972) formula <br />is not known. Because of the many available em- <br />pirical and semiempirical reaeration formulas, <br />completion of reaeration studies prior to making a <br />waste-load assimilative-capacity analysis would <br />result in a more accurate analysis. <br /> <br />As part of a second surface-water investigation, <br />traveltime, unit-concentration, and longitudinal- <br />dispersion characteristics were measured for <br />stream reaches on the Yampa and the Little Snake <br />Rivers. Two sets of data were collected for the <br />Yampa River and three sets of data were collected <br />for the Little Snake River. lnformation on travel- <br />time and unit concentrations provides a convenient <br />means of predicting the timing and peak con- <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.