Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2.5 <br /> <br />A. WATER WITHDRAWALS <br /> <br /> 2,150,000 <br /> a: <br /> <t 2.0 <br /> w <br /> ,. <br /> a: <br /> w <br /> 0- <br /> I- <br /> w <br /> w <br /> 'T <br /> w <br /> a: <br /> U <br /> <t 1.5 <br /> u. <br /> 0 <br /> V> <br /> Z <br /> 0 <br /> -' <br /> -' <br />'" :2' <br />'" <br /> '" <br /> ..i 1.0 <br /> <t <br /> '" <br /> <t <br /> a: <br /> 0 <br /> :r: <br /> I- <br /> ~ <br /> a: <br /> w <br /> I- 0.5 <br /> <t <br /> '" <br /> <br /> <br />45,700 44.400 <br />~Lili:>>2/d.._~..<:~i~::.::&::::j <br />Cool ing Wet cool ing <br />ponds towers <br />ELECTRIC POWER <br /> <br />25,400 <br />.VLLLLL./LtLLLtLL.Z<:l <br />COAL <br />GASIFICA- <br />TION <br /> <br />9.200 <br />COAL <br />SLURRY <br />PIPELINE <br /> <br /> B. WATER CONSUMPTION <br /> 50 Co <br /> (" <br /> . <br /> 44,400 . <br /> t, <br />a: t <br /><t <br />w <br />,. 40 <br />a: <br />w <br />0- <br />I- <br />W <br />w <br />'T <br />w <br />a: <br />U <br /><t <br />u. 30 <br />0 <br />V> <br />0 <br />z <br /><t 25.400 <br />V> " ' <br />:l ;~ffii~ <br />0 <br />:r: '%~~~' <br />I- Ill, <br />'" <br />z 20 ,,,,{;y~ <br /> ~~0'~" " <br /> "'~~ <br />0 :;/0.~/' <br />t;: ,"1~A-%::,/;x/ <br />:2' ~.~ <br />:l .~/~ <br />'" <br />z "-;"h:/1/ <br />0 .~);, <br />u ~"%;' <br />a: 10 %~J~f <br />w 9,200 <br />I- :~"':?}~ <br /><t ~ ?% :/. /% ~ <br />'" :,. <br /> ,~~~ <br /> :t.~. w.~- mA~ <br /> ~~}?~%: <br /> ~_ifl1 w8/ <br /> Jl,~f~/-~l~ J!1 fi$!fr<~ <br /> /::7~~~~:;/.' ,- ;0~~~r), <br /> Wet cool ing COAL COAL <br /> towers GASIFICA- SLURRY <br /> TION PIPELINE <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />FIGURE 4.-Comparison of water use for alternative cooling systems and coal use assuming 12.5 million tons (11.3 million t) of <br />coal mined per vear. (Modified from Hirsch and others. 1978.) <br />