Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~f1~- <br /> <br />tain regulatory obligations, such as providing a <br />surface-water-quality data base. Also, by compar- <br />ing water-quality data obtained subsequent to the <br />assessment with the assessment data, the coal- <br />mine operators are able to determine the effects of <br />their activities on surface-water qualit.y. Using the <br />comparisons, the coal-mine operators are able to <br />modify their activities, if needed, to minimize the <br />effects of mining on surface-water quality. <br />Regulatory agencies also are using both the <br />surface-water-quality data provided by the coal <br />companies and the assessment data to assess the <br />impacts of mining on surface-water quality. <br /> <br />As of 1980, projects to improve wastewater- <br />treatment facilities. implemented under Section <br />208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act <br />Amendments of 1972 (Public Law 92-500), have <br />been completed or are in progress at Steamboat <br />Springs (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, <br />1977), at Oak Creek and at Hayden in Routt <br />County, and at Craig in Moffat County (Norton, <br />Underwood, and Lamb, Engineering Associates, <br />1978). Surface-water-quality data from the Yampa <br />River basin assessment have been and are being <br />used by planners and engineers associated with <br />these projects to aid in the design of the <br />wastewater-treatment facilities. The data also are <br />being used to anticipate impacts of effluent dis- <br />charged from the plants. Model results of the <br />potential effects of the wastewater-treatment plant <br />at Steamboat Springs (Bauer and others, 1978) in- <br />dicated that certain standards for effluent did not <br />need to be as stringent as originally proposed in <br />order to meet specified water-quality goals, As a <br />result. local governments modified the standards <br />for effluent, which may have resulted in substan- <br />tial cost savings for the project. <br /> <br />Surface-water-quality data also were used in the <br />planning and feasibility reports prepared for a <br />reservoir in Routt County (Woodard-Clyde Con- <br />sultants, 1977). The data were used to establish <br />water-quality characteristics prior to reservoir con- <br />struction and to anticipate possible impacts of the <br />reservoir on water quality in the Yampa River. <br /> <br />Results from both the waste-load assimilative- <br />capacity analysis of the Yampa River (Bauer and <br />others. 1978) and the reservoir-development <br />analysis (D, B. Adams. D. P. Bauer, R. H. Dale, <br />and T. D. Steele, written commun., 1978) have <br />been used by local officials to determine the effects <br /> <br />of augmenting minimum streamflow by reservoir <br />releases. On the basis of these results. local officials <br />have concluded that selected ambient water- <br />quality characteristics may be improved by flow <br />augmentation and that the impact of pollutants <br />discharged to streams downstream from reservoirs <br />can be reduced by flow augmentation. <br />Another aspect of the use of data from the <br />Yampa River basin assessment involved the North <br />West Colorado Council of Governments, a local <br />multicounty governmental agency, that received <br />funds under Section 208 of the Federal Water Pol- <br />lution Control Amendments Act of 1972 (Public <br />Law 92-500) to develop an area-wide water-quali- <br />ty-management plan. As stipulated in Section 208 <br />of Public Law 92-500, the North West Colorado <br />Council of Governments is to identify surface- <br />water-quality problems within the six-county area <br />it represents and is to implement measures to <br />eliminate existing problems and prevent future <br />problems. AI; the goal of identifying existing water- <br />quality problems was similar to that of the Yampa <br />River basin assessment, cooperative program ef- <br />forts were modified by the U.S. Geological Survey <br />to fulfill the Section-2OO requirements for water- <br />quality information from Routt County (U.S. <br />Geological Survey. 1976). As a result, data <br />provided by the U.S. Geological Survey were <br />suitable for use by the North West Colorado Coun- <br />cil of Governments in its Section-208 planning <br />endeavor (Britton, 1979), Thus. the two agencies <br />were able to minimize duplication of effort by coor- <br />dinating desired study products. <br />In summary, local officials are using data and in- <br />formation from several studies conducted during <br />the Yampa River basin assessment. Information <br />from this and related projects has allowed officials <br />and managers to fulfill regulatory obligations and <br />to predict some of the effects of planned develop- <br />ment on the water resources of the region. <br />Moreover, an attempt has been made to present <br />the resultant information in a form that is under- <br />standable and applicable to regional problems. <br />Technical studies in other energy-developing <br />regions might well apply the reporting format used <br />by this basin assessment. Information surveys <br />conducted in the future will be the best judge of <br />the extent to which attempts at communicating <br />technical information have been successful and will <br />indicate better ways to provide information for <br />decision making. <br /> <br />13 <br />