Laserfiche WebLink
<br />20'';].. <br />...n. <br /> <br />csu TeCnntCJI ana EnVIronmental StuD,es Proposal <br /> <br />. Federal, State, and Local Permitting <br />Requirements: :-"(omgomery Watson nas <br />prevIously Identified the federal, state, and <br />local pcrmitong requirements applicable to <br />the CSU Water Resource Plan projects. Six <br />federal, seven s tate, and three local agencies <br />will be required to grant approximately 23 <br />separate permits. Meetings have previously <br />been neld with all of these agencies to scope <br />the probable issues involved and the <br />permitting requirements, <br /> <br />Project Management <br />Project management strategies and capabilities <br />are one of the key success factors of this WRP <br />project permitting effort. An important project <br />management issue is the synergy of the <br />consultant team with CSU staff and an <br />understanding of the team approach to the work <br />plan. Both MW and BV have historically used a <br />tearn approach to the development of their <br />project assignments. In addition, the leadership of <br />the proposed MW /BV team has worked together <br />on many assignments for the benefit of CSU and <br /> <br />Scope of Work <br /> <br />Introduction <br />We nave developed a scope of work for <br />conducang the first phase of the CSlJ Water <br />Resources Plan Technical and Envirorunental <br />Srudies project based on the following principles: <br /> <br />. Tasks are described in terms of the work to <br />be performed and products to be produced. <br />. Emphasis is on developing the five Technical <br />Reports identified in the RFP. A <br />recommended additional task of performing <br />an Alternatives Evaluation is also described. <br />The objective of these reports is to describe <br />general envirorunental issues surrounding <br />each of the CSU storage alternatives, and <br />identify any "fatal flaws" that would require <br />alternatives to be modified or dropped from <br />further consideration, The reports will also <br />identify needs for further ru.ta development, <br />field work, or analysis to support the <br />remainder of the environmental permitting <br />process. <br /> <br />Projod <br />Management <br />CoorUinalion: <br /> <br />Work Flow Diagram <br /> <br />PROJECT SCOPING <br />KeyOutcolnes: <br />NEPASIratllgy <br />Wort< Plans <br />Permitling ReQu_ <br /> <br />is empowered to deliver the full <br />resources of their organizations to assist <br />CS U in this effort. I t will be the joint <br />responsibility of the !\olW /BV team <br />management to participate actively in <br />the project so that the team's experience <br />for this assignment can allow us to <br />perform as we should, at less cost and <br />more thoroughly than a less experienced <br />team. Our team members understand <br />the role they will play within the overall <br />umbrella of CSU's Water Resource Plan <br />under staff direction, <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING <br />Key Outcomes: <br />Al!llma1MI Screeni1g <br />SIlr.Igo Comblialions <br />Cools <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />WATER QUAUTY STUDIES .. <br />I\oy Outcanes: .: ,: <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />Fatal Fbw Analyses <br /> <br />CULTURAL STUDIES <br />Key Outcomes: <br /> <br />Fatal Flow Analyses <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES '. <br />KsyOu1l:llmos:' ..,' <br />Welland 5aoonIng ,..., .. <br />Throalenod Spociot SaoenIng <br />Fatal Flaw . <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION <br />Key Outcomes: <br /> <br />Technical Memorandum <br /> <br />6 <br />