My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07478
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07478
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:31 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:25:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.600.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Basin Member State Info - Utah
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/1/1982
Title
Salt Uptake in Natural Channels Traversing Mancos Shales in the Price River Basin - Utah
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Table 7.1. Correlations used to estimate 1973-1975 flows at Heiner. <br /> <br /> Month Equation Degrees of Freedom 2 <br /> r <br /> Jan. H . 543 + 0.19 (5R) + 3.83 (WC) 5 0.59 <br /> Feb. II . 421 + 0.67 (SR) + 3.1 (WC) 5 0.67 <br />N Mar. H = 907 + 1.06 (5R) + 2.3 (WC) 5 0.993 <br />~ Apr. H = 1749 + 1.05 (SR) + 3.2 (WG) 5 0.997 <br />0 May H = 137 + 3.95 (BG) + 1.84 (WG) 15 0.98 <br />00 + 0.62 (WR) + 0.98 (SR) <br /> Jun. H . 137 + 3.95 (BG) + 1. 84 (WG) 15 0.98 <br /> + 0.62 (WR) + 0.98 (5R) <br /> .Tul. H = -1309 - 10.0 (BG) + 7.57 (WG) 15 0.95 <br /> + 2.16 (WR) + 1.03 (5R) <br /> Aug. H = -1309 - 10.0 (BG) + 7.57 (WG) 15 0.95 <br /> + 2.16 (WR) + 1.03 (5R) <br /> Sep. H = -1309 - 10.0 (BC) + 7.57 (WG) 15 0.95 <br /> + 2.16 (WR) + 1.03 (5R) <br /> Oct. H = -166 + 0.96 (5R) + 5.76 (WG) 5 0.95 <br /> Nov. H = 155 + 1. 0 (5R) + 4.1 (WC) 5 0.96 <br /> Dec. H = 866 + 0.08 (SR) + 7.4 (WC) 5 0.85 <br /> H = Flow at Heiner (AF/mo) <br /> SR = Flow at Scofield Reservoir (AF/mo) <br /> we = Flow at Willow Creek (AF/mo) <br /> WR = Flow at White River (AF/mo) <br /> Be = Flow at Beaver Creek (AF/mo) <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br />l <br /> <br />, <br />~ <br />l <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />79 percent for conveyance efficiency and <br />85 percent for application efficiency. The <br />application efficiency seems high, but model <br />calibration was sensitive to this parameter <br />and 85 gave the best match. <br /> <br />The model calibration indicated a <br />lag of about 7 months in deep percolation <br />flows. Agricultural return flows were esti- <br />ma ted to have a dissolved solids concentra- <br />tion of about 5350 mg/l. These concentrations <br />appear reasonable in that Desert Seep Wash <br />drains a major portion of the agricultural <br />lands of the basin and typically has dis- <br />solved solids concentrations from 2500 to <br />4000 mg/l. Reduced dilution may account for <br />the difference between Desert Seep Wash <br />concentrations and the 5350 mg/l predicted <br />for agricultural return flows by BSAMl. <br />Another possibility would be that the cali- <br />brated 85 percent application efficiency is <br />too high. <br /> <br />~.. <br /> <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />r <br />l <br />I <br /> <br />f~ <br />, <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Simulation runs <br />project the ef fects on <br />different management <br /> <br />were also made to <br />flows at Woodside of <br />alternatives. The <br /> <br />results are summarized in Table 7.2 and <br />highlighted as follows: <br />1. Ungaged inflow was reduced by 20 <br />percent to determine the effect of upstream <br />detention. The results showed an increase in <br />basin outflow dissolved solids concentrations <br />of about 1.6 percent but a decrease in total <br />salt outflow of about 2.3 percent (Figures <br />7.5 and 7.6). <br /> <br />2. Irrigation efficiencies were raised <br />by 10 percent to determine the effect of <br />improved irrigation techniques. Results <br />showed an increase in the dissolved solids <br />concentration (TDS) of the basin outflow of <br />7.1 percent, but a decrease in total salt <br />output of about 7.3 percent (Figures 7.7 and <br />7.8). <br /> <br />3. Alfalfa (a high water user) on 9200 <br />acres was changed to corn (a low water user), <br />and 1000 acres of phreatophytes were elimi- <br />nated. Dissolved solids concentrations <br />stayed constant while total salt output rose <br />5.5 percent (Figures 7.9 and 7.10). <br /> <br />67 <br /> <br />\ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.