Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l'V <br />~ <br />o <br />(7) <br /> <br />inflow than salt outflow, implying a net <br />deposit of salt in the valley. Desert Seep <br />Wash drains agricultural lands and, at <br />the gaging station, is more indicative of <br />agricultural loading than of natural inflows. <br />Hence, Desert Seep Wash was not modeled <br />further. <br /> <br /> <br />CHAPTER VII <br />BASIN-WIDE HYDROSALINITY STUDY <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Narasimhan et al. (1980) compared a <br />number of hydrosalinity models and concluded <br />that the models generally suffer the weak- <br />nesses of oversimplifications of 1) chemical <br />processes, 2) surface-soil-groundwater <br />interactions, and 3) salt pickup phenomena. <br />Nevertheless, using one of the best of the <br />available models, additional insight into <br />water and salt flows within the Price River <br />Basin was sought by applying BSAMl, developed <br />by Huber et al. (1976). The model employs <br />water and salt mass balance accounting on a <br />monthly time interval through the representa- <br />tion of the hydrologic system shown in Figure <br />7.1. In the application, only the runoff and <br />salt fluxes from the valley bottom lands were <br />cons idered. <br /> <br />Data <br /> <br />The BSAM modeling was based on the USGS <br />gaging station near. Heiner, where Price River <br />emerges from the' mountains onto the valley <br />floor for water years 1973 through 1975. <br />Since that station was discontinued in <br />1969, regression analyses were performed <br />correlating flows for each month of the year <br />at Heiner during the 1960s with recorded <br />flows at USGS gages at Willow Creek, Beaver <br />Creek, White River, and Scofield Reservoir <br />(all of which are upstream of Heiner--see <br />Figure 1.1). During the winter months, only <br />flows at Willow Creek and Scofield Reservoir <br />were used because of inaccurate or incom- <br />plete records at the other two stations. <br />Many combinations of recorded flow records <br />were examined. The highest correlations are <br />tabulated in Table 7.1. <br /> <br />Precipitation ,and temperature data from <br />the weather stations at Hiawatha, Sunnyside, <br />and Price Warehouse were also used as input <br />data for BSAM. These stations are scattered <br />within the basin and provide fairly repre- <br />sentative temperature data. More precipita- <br />t ion gages would have been helpful. I t is <br />apparent from an examination of precipita- <br />tion and streamflow records that localized <br />thunderstorms causing significant runoff may <br />miss all three precipitation gages. This <br />causes error in the calibration of the <br />model. <br /> <br />Gordon Creek and Desert Seep Wash, two <br />major tributaries of the Price River, were <br />modeled to estimate ungaged surface inflows <br />of water and salt. These runs proved un- <br />satisfactory in that there was more salt <br /> <br />Records in the State Engineer's office <br />were examined for canal diversion data. <br />Canal water imported from the San Rafael <br />Basin is not measured, and this quantity, <br />therefore, was estimated from the irrigated <br />acreage served. Estimates of groundwater <br />inflow were taken from Cordova (1964). <br /> <br />Results <br /> <br />The match with recorded data achieved in <br />calibrating BSAMl to Price River flows at <br />woodside is portrayed for water flow (Figure <br />7.2), total salt flow (Figure 7.3), and salt <br />concentration (Figure 7.4). BSAMl models <br />total salt outflow from the basin by summing <br />loadings from various sources. The amount of <br />salt loading indicated by the model as coming <br />from agricultural lands suggest them to be a <br />major salt source in the Price River Basin. <br />Of the apptoximately 190,000 tons of salt <br />leaving the basin at Woodside annually during <br />the calibration peri~d, about 76,000 tons or <br />40 percent originated within the central <br />basin. Model results also indicate that <br />about 3,500 tons originated with ungaged <br />overland flow and pickup by channel process- <br />es. These figures agree closely with the <br />estimates given in Chapter VI. <br /> <br />The remaining 72,500 tons of salt <br />originating annually within the central basin <br />are from surface agricultural return flows <br />and groundwater inflows to the Price River. <br />Agriculture is thus an important salt source. <br /> <br />Approximately 114,000 tons of salt were <br />modeled during 1973-1975 as entering the <br />central portion of the basin in approximately <br />120,000 acre-feet of water (average TDS <br />approximately 700 mgfl), but only about <br />75,000 acre-feet of water were modeled <br />leaving the basin. Even without any salt <br />pickup in the basin, the outgoing TDS <br />would be about 1100 mgfl--a significant <br />increase from the 700 mgfl--just from concen- <br />tration effects caused by evapotranspiration. <br />A large portion of this loss is from agri- <br />cultural crops. <br /> <br />Model results indicate that irrigation <br />efficiencies in the valley are fairly high-- <br /> <br />65 <br />