My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07478
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07478
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:31 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:25:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.600.60
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Basin Member State Info - Utah
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/1/1982
Title
Salt Uptake in Natural Channels Traversing Mancos Shales in the Price River Basin - Utah
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
202
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />terns characteristic of the hydrologic region <br />from the few events recorded annually at any <br />one gaged site in this arid climate. There- <br />fore the use of storms generated from region- <br />al data as being characteristic of and <br />equally likely to occur anywhere in the Price <br />River valley was judged superior to use of a <br />measured data sequence at a specific site. <br />Regional storm generation requires the <br />development of probability distributions for <br />principal storm pattern characteristics. <br />These probability distributions also provide <br />a potential for generating storm events of a <br />preselected frequency. <br /> <br />The five factors used in developing <br />these probability distributions were time of <br />year, probability of a storm occurring, <br />amount of precipitation, storm duration, and <br />precipitation distribution during the storm. <br />Time-of-year variability was handled by <br />developing separate distributions for the <br />other four variables for each month (April <br />through Octoher) and combining consecutive <br />months with like distributions where pos- <br />sible. These four variables were specifi- <br />cally handled as follows: <br /> <br />tv <br />o <br />c.:;;J <br />~ <br /> <br />1. For each month, the number of days <br />having measurable precipitation was deter- <br />mined and plotted as shown for June in Figure <br />5.4. A line fit by the Gumbel distribution <br /> <br /> 1) <br /> 12 <br /> " <br /> 0 <br /> '" <br /> " 11 <br /> . <br /> " <br /> '" <br /> Po 10 <br /> ." <br /> u <br /> . <br /> " <br /> Po 9 <br /> . <br /> .-< <br /> '" R <br /> . <br /> " <br /> " <br /> . 7 <br /> . <br /> . <br /> " <br /> "' 6 <br /> " <br /> '" <br /> . <br /> "' 5 <br /> " <br /> " <br /> 0 , <br /> " <br /> " <br /> '" <br /> . ) <br />f ~ <br />'" <br />~ ~ 2 <br />0 <br />" <br />. <br />'" <br />~ 0 <br />z <br /> <br />is shown plotted through these points. <br />Regressions were run for the number of days <br />of precipitation in a given month on the <br />number of days in the preceding month, but <br />low correlations led to dropping the number <br />of rainy days in the preceding month as a <br />significant variable. <br /> <br />2. Also for each month. the depths of <br />precipitation on days with storms were <br />plotted as shown for May in Figure 5.5. A <br />.line f it with a log-normal distribution is <br />shown. <br /> <br />3. Since storID duration varies with <br />storID depth, the storms were divided into <br />five depth ranges and durations were sepa- <br />rately plotted by range as shown in Figure <br />5.6. <br /> <br />4. A characteristic storm hyetograph <br />shape was developed from recording precipita- <br />tion gages in the Price and nearby Green <br />River Basins with the results shown in Figure <br />5.7. Use of this shape neglects the pos- <br />sibility of more than one storm occurring in <br />the same day. <br /> <br />The plotted information for these four <br />distributions for the corresponding mohth <br />provided the data used in Subroutine RAiN to <br /> <br /> - /' <br /> / <br /> / <br />, I '/ <br /> / <br /> ~ <br /> / <br /> -+ <br /> '/ <br /> '/ <br /> I/i <br /> V I I <br /> i <br /> / i <br /> ./ <br /> / <br /> / <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />PROBABILITY (percent) <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />95 <br /> <br />98 <br /> <br />99 <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 5.4. Gumbel distribution of days with precipitation in June. Weather data were taken <br />from U. S. Weather Bureau station records in the Price and San Rafael River Basins. <br /> <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.