Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tv <br />o <br />-.J <br />..... <br /> <br />~mhos/cm @ 250C, The conductivity probe <br />was buried under sediment, and a delayed <br />response masked the shape and timing of <br />the halograph. While some sediment induced <br />error is probable, the above maximum and <br />minimum conductivity values are close. <br /> <br />Cosl Creek flow and <br />Quality measurements <br /> <br />Conductivity and flow measurements made <br />on Coal Creek during 1976 are plotted on <br />Figures 4.8 to 4.15 inclusive for sites shown <br />on Figures 3.1 and 3.2. The average observed <br />streamflow in Coal Creek, below the Book <br />Cliffs, declined from 1.5 cfs in April to <br />0.25 cfs in August (Figure 4.9). The mix of <br />anions and cations at the upper site was <br />fairly constant (Appendix C, Table C-2). <br />Conductivity increased from an average of <br />750 ~mhos/cm at 250C in April to 1000 <br />~mhoB/cm at 250C in October with measurements <br />made every 30 days (Figure 4.8). Sharply <br />lower values of conductivity were observed <br />after a storm event. This is attributed <br />to the dilution effects of overland flow and <br />to the low quantities of residual salta held <br />in the sediments of the Coal Creek channel. <br /> <br />Linear regression analyses were applied <br />to estimate six chemical constituents using <br />conductivity as the independent variable. The <br />t-test was used to test the null hypothesis <br />that the slope of the regression line equals <br />zero. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />y ~ a + b [Conductivity] . . . . . (4.1) <br /> <br />in which <br /> <br />Y TDS or individual ion concen- <br />tration <br />a and b = Constants <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />The results are shown in Table 4.1. The low <br />correlation coefficients were due primarily <br />to grouping of the observed values within a <br />very small range; this is particularly <br />evident at the spring where the quantities of <br />flow and chemical constituents varied in too <br />small a range for meaningful regression to be <br />possible. <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />At no time were overland return flows <br />from the irrigated land associated with an <br />increase in conductivity of more than 10 <br />percent of that measured at the upper site. <br />Because of seepage, the flow diminished and <br />often disappeared in the 3-mile section below <br />the upper site (Figure 3.1), Approximately 3 <br />miles below the Book Cliffs, water enters <br />Coal Creek from numerous sIDall seeps and one, <br />large spring. The source and the extent of <br />the aquifer supplying the seeps and spring <br />are unknown (Gwynn 1976). <br /> <br />Discharge and water quality at the <br />spring were monitored. Flow (Figure 4.11) <br />was observed to peak at 0.1 cfs during April <br />and to steadily decline to 0.04 ds during <br />December. Conductivity (Figure 4.10) remained <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />l <br /> <br />stable with an observed mean of 2759 ~mhos/cm <br />at 25'C and a standard deviation of 235 <br />~mhOS/CID at 250C. Data presented in Appendix <br />C (Table C-2) also show that the concentraC <br />tions of the chemical ions in the spring <br />discharge were nearly constant. <br /> <br />The middle sampling site was located <br />approximately 3.25 miles below Coal Creek's <br />emergence from the Book Cliffs (Figure 3.1). <br />The observed flows were generally low, except <br />following storm events, and came from the <br />spring and seeps immediately upstream (Figure <br />4.13). The conductivity ranged from approxi- <br />mately 1000 ~mhos/cm at 250C to 3200 umhos/cm <br />at 250C (Figure 4.12). The large variation <br />in conductivity was due to dilution by storm <br />runoff. At low flows, the majority of the <br />flow originated as groundwater of approxi- <br />mately 2760 umhos/cm at 250C. At high flowa <br />the majority of the flow originated as sur- <br />face runoff from either the upper part of <br />the subbasin or above the upper site and ex- <br />hibited little channel salt uptake. Parti- <br />cularly high correlations with conductivity <br />(Table 4.1) were obtained at this site for <br />TDS and sulfate. <br /> <br /> <br />The flow at the lower site, 8.2 miles <br />downstream from the Book Cliffs (Figure 3.1), <br />was highly ephemeral (Figure 4.15). Much of <br />the flow passing the middle site was lost <br />through channel seepage and evaporation <br />between the two sites. During periods of <br />continuous flow, very little salt uptake <br />occurred in the Coal Creek channel, and <br />the conductivity of the lower site approached <br />that of the upper site (Figure 4.14). During <br />periods of low flow, when groundwater repre- <br />s ented the major source of flow, the con- <br />ductivity equaled or exceeded the mean <br />groundwater conductivity. From Table 4.1 <br />high correlati.m coefficients (Equation 4.3) <br />were obtained for TDS, sulfate, magnesium, <br />and chloride, The null hypothesis waS <br />rejected at the 0.99 confidence level for all <br />seven regressions. <br /> <br />Mean measured values of anions and <br />cations at each site are listed in Table 4.2. <br />On a given date, TDS measurements at the <br />middle and lower sites usually were very <br />close (Appendix C, Table C.2). The smaller <br />mean value of the TDS at the lower site <br />(Table 4.2) is explained on the basis that a <br />larger number of samples were taken at this <br />loca t ion than a t the middle site dur ing <br />spring runoff. <br /> <br />Salinity from the Coal Creek <br />channel sediments <br /> <br />The natural channel bottoms in the Coal <br />Creek basin are composed of unconsolidated <br />bed material and exposed Mancos Shale. The <br />channels display surface efflorescence <br />varying from a dense white blanket to inter- <br />mittent small discrete deposits. Mass <br />transport of the channel bed material by <br />major storm events was observed during the <br />study reported here and by Mundorff (1972). <br />During relatively steady and uniform low flow <br /> <br />29 <br />