Laserfiche WebLink
<br />vi <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />The plan of study provides a framework for conducting the Missouri River <br />Basin Hydrology Study. The sheer size of the basin (figure l)--one-sixth of <br />the contiguous area of the United States-- gives rise to a wide diversity of <br />resource problems. <br /> <br />A fundamental concern of resource planners and managers are the different <br /> <br />basic hydrologic estimates describing the historical and existing situation <br />which must be reconciled and accepted:by the various State, Federal, regional, <br /> <br />and local interests before the major water and related land resources problems <br /> <br />and issues within the Missouri River Basin can be effectively addressed. This <br />hydrology study will provide an analytical tool to address water related issues. <br />A number of studies have been conducted in the Missouri River Basin in <br /> <br />recent years to estimate current and projected water use and availability. <br /> <br />Results from these studies differ substantially. This is illustrated by <br />comparing results of the Missouri River Basin Comprehensive Framework Study <br />(1971) and those of the Second National Water Assessment (1979). <br />The framework study estimate for 1970 level net ground and surface water <br />depletions above Sioux City is 6.4 million acre-feet per year, as contrasted <br />with 9.7 million acre-feet per year estimated in the national assessment's <br /> <br />state-regional future. The corresponding national future estimate in the <br /> <br />national assessment was 5.7 million acre-feet. Differences between <br /> <br />corresponding estimates of water use and availability in subareas are even more <br /> <br />pronounced. <br /> <br />Lack of an agreed upon basinwide hydrologic data base and lack of <br />analytical tools for evaluating the effects of water management alternatives on <br /> <br />a consistent basis preclude the resolution of several critical problems. They <br /> <br />are: <br />