My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07460
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:24:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.400
Description
Title I - Mexican Treaty
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/1963
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Special Studies - Delivery of Water to Mexico
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Title I Program <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act <br /> <br />For example, one result of the WMIDD <br />irrigation drainage reduction program was <br />to reduce the volume of the YDP reject <br />stream from about 40,000 to about <br />29,500 acre-feet per year by reducing the <br />volume of the irrigation drainage, The <br />installed capacity of the YDP was <br />subsequently reduced from 96 MGD to <br />72.4 MGD. Therefore, the reject stream <br />volume has been permanently reduced <br />by 25 percent, <br /> <br />Ongoing Replacement Water Studies <br /> <br />Currently, Reclamation is studying ways to <br />increase YDP efficiencies to further reduce <br />the volume of the reject stream. These <br />studies are an integral part of the YDP cost <br />reduction program discussed in chapter IV. <br />The new membrane technologies program <br />would contribute most directly toward <br />increased efficiencies. <br /> <br />To obtain a source of replacement water for <br />the YDP reject stream, Reclamation is <br />investigating a proposal to remove riparian <br />salt cedar along the lower Colorado River <br />and replace it with vegetation with lower <br />water demands, This plan would reduce <br />nonbeneficial consumptive water use along <br />the river while simultaneously improving <br />wildlife habitat and recreation values, <br /> <br />Studies of this proposal are being conducted <br />in two phases. Phase I was initiated in <br />June 1989, and a draft report was com- <br />pleted in June 1990, The report <br />documented existing conditions and the <br />factors affecting salt cedar removal and <br />revegetation and included sample feasibility <br />analysis plans. <br /> <br />Phase II has three objectives: (1) to develop <br />a 20-year revegetation management plan, <br />(2) to develop a financial analysis testing <br />the feasibility of using the saved water to <br />replace the reject stream, and (3) to develop <br />a management structure to implement a <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />management plan. The 20-year manage- <br />ment plan will be developed by initiating a <br />programmatic environmental assessment! <br />environmental impact statement (EAlEIS), <br />Coordination with the lower Basin States <br />will continue to ensure their acceptance and <br />support. (Also see figure 5,) <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Preliminary studies indicate that water <br />savings of 1.0 to 1.5 acre-feet per acre are <br />possible. To replace 29,500 acre-feet per <br />year of reject stream, about 20,000 acres of <br />salt cedar would need to be replaced. <br /> <br />As a fiscal year 1994 planning start, <br />Reclamation is also investigating a proposal <br />to create storage on the lower Colorado <br />River to capture water ordered, but not <br />diverted, and regulatory waste that would <br />otherwise be lost to Mexico as excess <br />deliveries. Preliminary work is currently <br />funded with Environmental and <br />Interagency Coordination Activities and <br />Yuma Area Projects operation and <br />maintenance funds, The source of funding <br />for future work has not yet been determined. <br /> <br />Supporting the Primary <br />Objective in the Future <br />Without the YDP <br /> <br />No permanent approach to complying with <br />the obligations of Minute No. 242, other <br />than operating the YDP, is under active <br />consideration, If the YDP is not operated, <br />Reclamation would continue to bypass all <br />WMlDD irrigation drainage and substitute <br />water from upstream storage for treaty <br />deliveries to Mexico, After the United <br />States loses use of the water conserved by <br />lining the Coachella Canal, it will have a <br />significantly reduced ability to replace this <br />bypass. Should the United States secure <br />water to replace the reject stream, that <br />amount of water would be available to <br />replace bypassed WMIDD irrigation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.