Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />Plan I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e'.\ <br /> <br />\()'~', <br />~'~....\...../ ~ <br />. <br />002563 <br />Maximum <br />Incremental <br />Cost <br />Effectiveness <br />$IOO~/mg/L <br /> <br />Alternstive <br /> <br />Description <br /> <br />(mg/L) <br />Effect <br />st Imperial <br /> <br />Annual <br />Cost <br /> <br />Canst rue t ion <br />Cost <br /> <br />($1000) <br /> <br />($1000) <br /> <br />Overall <br />Cost <br />Effectiveness <br />$1000/mg/L <br /> <br />Incremental <br />Cost <br />Effectiveness <br />$1000/mg/L <br /> <br /> 1. Salt Creek Collector System <br /> Ute 500 MW Wet Tower 2.12 370 5,690 175 175 175 <br /> 2. Salt Creek Collector System 1. 79 370 207 <br /> W Laterals Concrete 1.40 449 321 <br /> V Laterals Concr,ete 2.33 801 344 36'8 !I . <br /> 5.52 1620 24,890 ill 368 <br /> 3. Alternative #2 5.52 1620 <br /> K Laterals Concrete 0.69 346 502 lQL <br /> 6:TI 1966 30,210 ill 502 <br /> 4.~ Alternative 13 6.21 1966 <br /> G Lateral Concrete .30 157 523 <br /> F " " .35 200 571 <br /> C .. .. .55 315 573 <br /> D " .. .67 405 604 <br /> B .. .. .64 405 633 <br /> A " .. .52 336 646 <br /> L .. .. .21 152 724 <br /> ATH Combination ?J 1.00 611 611 <br /> Collector Sy~ Big <br /> Salt Wssh ~ lK<><kp .62 500 806 806 <br /> All Latersls to 0.89 ft 3/s <br /> Pipe .23 - . <br /> 11. 30 5047 77 ,550 447 605 - <br /> 5. Alternstive , 4 11.30 5047 <br /> W Canal Concrete .36 454 1261 1261 <br /> The incremental ~:4;~:i~~Ltween 11.66 5501 84.530 m- m;r <br />y Alternatives I and 2 1s greater than any of the in!lividual increment,s becauae of <br />the reduced effectiveness of the collector system due to lining the West End Laterals. <br /> <br />2/ S~~ l7}uLe/ <br />(6ov If #~~, <br />;1/ . /1-..1/1 ~~ ,-"'0 <br /> <br />a6~~1! ) <br />~a-~~ <br />('C<-w-~.Ji':' <-.., ) <br /> <br />?f t~~--t-. c6..4' ~~~.(7- ~~~ . <br /> <br />cJL/ ;g,/.b2~ './~.d <br />