Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />J03340 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The stochastically generated traces in the technical addendum (5 <br /> <br /> <br />traces of 500 years each) were reviewed in order to determine the average <br /> <br /> <br />characteristics of the two additional types of drought, i.e., the drought <br /> <br /> <br />containing the worst single-year and the 4-year running average drought <br /> <br /> <br />with the worst long-term deficit. The results are summarized in Table 9. <br /> <br /> <br />In the case of the l-in-500 drought, the procedure consisted of manually <br /> <br /> <br />determining the worst droughts that occurred in each of the 5 traces and <br /> <br /> <br />then averaging the droughts to arrive at the worst average dtought that <br /> <br /> <br />could be expected to occur once every 500 years. The procedure was <br /> <br />repeated for the l-in-l00 drought except that 25 traces of 100 years each <br /> <br /> <br />were used. The l-in-20 droughts were determined using only data set 2 with <br /> <br /> <br />25 traces of 20 years each. Characteristics were not determined for the <br /> <br /> <br />l-in-50 droughts, but they can be estimated based on the 1:20 and 1:100 <br /> <br /> <br />droughts. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It should be noted that the results in Table 9 are only approximate. <br /> <br /> <br />More accurate figures could be obtained using the entire 50,000 years of <br /> <br /> <br />generated record and using computer programs. The results based on only 5 <br /> <br />traces of 500 years each are sufficiently accurate, however, for approxi- <br /> <br /> <br />mating the general characteristics of the two additional drought types. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Selection of typical l-in-20, l-in-50, l-in-l00, and l-in-500 droughts <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It is very difficult to select typical l-in-20, l-in-50, l-in-l00, or <br /> <br /> <br />l-in-500 droughts from the long-term synthetic record. That is because <br /> <br /> <br />every drought is different in its o~ way and because a drought that may be" <br /> <br /> <br />extreme in one respect, such as severity (or total deficit), may not be <br /> <br />that bad in another, such as magnitude (or low average annual flows). It <br /> <br /> <br />was decided, from a water supply standpoint. that three types of drought <br /> <br />should be considered: (1) a drought containing the worst single year, <br /> <br /> <br />(2) a drought with the worst severity (or total deficit over consecutive <br /> <br /> <br />dry years), and (3) a 4-year running average drought with the worst long- <br /> <br /> <br />term deficit (where an occasional above-average year does not necessarily <br /> <br />end the drought). The three types of drought were considered because it <br /> <br /> <br />was believed that the first would stress direct-flow water rights, the <br /> <br /> <br />second would stress short-term reservoir storage, and the third would <br /> <br /> <br />stress long-term reservoir storage. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />GJ <br /> <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />R€)OURC€ CON)ULTI\NT) INC <br /> <br />I <br />