Laserfiche WebLink
<br />;\ <br /> <br />OOZtJUI <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Colorado River Environmental Activities <br /> <br />Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program <br /> <br />As was discussed at last month's Board meeting, the Lower Colorado River Multi-Species <br />Conservation Program (LCR MSCP) Coordinating Team (CT) is meeting frequently in an effort to <br />develop consensus positions related to the preparation of the draft LCR MSCP Conservation Plan, <br />Implementation Agreements, long-tenn funding agreements, and assurances related to long-tenn <br />environmental compliance. <br /> <br />Prior to each of the CT meetings, the California MSCP Caucus meets and reviews the <br />proposed agenda for the CT meetings and develops California positions for each ofthe agenda items. <br />At the January 2-3 meetings of the CT, the participants developed points of tentative agreement <br />(PTAs) related to the following topics: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The tenn of the LCR MSCP will be for fifty (50) years; <br />The LCR MSCP Biological Opinion (federal document) will include a "conference opinion" <br />for unlisted species and will cover all federal actions, including the issuance of the non- <br />federal Section 10 incidental take pennit; <br />The LCR MSCP will address ESA Section 7 and 10 actions, including: <br />- Federal covered projects list will be expanded to include non-discretionary federal <br />activities, to ensure that effects are identified, evaluated, and mitigated; <br />- State covered projects lists should be expanded to include non-discretionary federal <br />activities, to ensure that all effects are identified, evaluated, and mitigated. <br />The obligation to provide mitigation for tribal projects, included as MSCP covered projects, <br />is not the responsibility ofthe States; and that approximately 100 acres of impact associated <br />with Tribal projects is within California; and that the BlA and Tribes seeking incidental take <br />authorization in the three states; <br />The definitions and concepts associated with "environmental baseline," "effects of the <br />action," and "potential habitat," as memorialized in the USFWS letter of June 5, 2002 are <br />adopted and agreed to; <br />The effects of increased upper basin depletions are included in the environmental baseline, <br />and are not included in the LCR MSCP as a covered project, nor is there any intent for the <br />LCR MSCP to provide any mitigation for any associated impacts related to Upper Basin <br />depletions; and <br />After reasonable investigation, the participants are not aware of any inter-related or inter- <br />dependent actions other than the non-federal covered actions. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Additionally, the meeting participants reviewed the LCR MSCP covered species lists with <br />representatives of the USFWS. After significant discussion, the federal covered species list was <br />reduced from a total of 49 species to 31 species. A similar discussion remains to be held with CDFG <br />regarding species proposed for coverage under California Fish and Game Code. <br /> <br />9 <br />