My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07437
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07437
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:20 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:23:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.851
Description
La Verkin Springs Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1984
Title
La Verkin Springs Unit Utah Preliminary Findings Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />salt) near St. George - Infiltration Loss + Littlefield Springs <br />Flow (and salt) + the Intervening Flow (and salt) between near <br />St. George and the Virgin River at Littlefield. <br /> <br />This analysis assumes that any reduction in salt loading at <br />the Littlefield gage would be fully realized at Lake Mead. <br />The travel time between Littlefield Springs and the Imperial <br />Dam was estimated, for the economic analysis, to be 4 years. <br /> <br />VI. SALT PICKUP OF INFILTRATION LOSS BEFORE IT EMERGES <br />AS LITTLEFIELD SPRINGS <br /> <br />Assume that the 60ft3/sec Infiltration Loss near Bloomington, Utah, is the <br />source of Littlefield Springs. <br /> <br />Littlefield Springs flow has a quality of 2920 mg/L total dissolved solids <br />(TDS). The infiltration loss, assumed to be the source of the Littlefield <br />Springs flow, has a qual ity of 2133 mg/L TDS. This impl ies that this water <br />.picks up. 787 mg/L TDS of salt underground. <br /> <br />Investigation during the previous study (USSR, February 1979) revealed the <br />Littlefield Springs flow to be saturated with respect to calcite. To assess the <br />salt pickup that would occur if the water lost to infiltration was improved in <br />quality (due to the La Verkin Springs project), the following assumptions were <br />cons i dered: <br /> <br />A. The salt pickup, in mg/L, for each major ion would remain constant, <br />except for Ca and HC03. <br /> <br />S. <br /> <br />Calcite is considered as Ca + HCO. These ions rer.ain at the sar,IC <br />concentration 1n the Littlefield ~prings fiow and are assumed to <br />be at saturation. <br /> <br />C. TherE would be no effect on the Littlef1elc Springs fluv: for a <br />minimum of 22 years (the calculated travel time through the <br />underground system as presented in previous investigations (USSR, <br />February 1979; Trudeau, August 1979)). <br /> <br />Table 4 de~onstrates how the salt picku~ ~dS Calculated. Table 6 <br />de~onstrates how thlS salt pickur V:d, usee tu determine the effect <br />rec.:.,ving La VerK1n Springs wou"ld hctve on tne Littlef1eld Sprir,ss <br />flow. <br /> <br />The result of this analysis is that if the La Verkin Springs are <br />fully_diverted, the iffiproved quality of water lost to infiltration <br />(6Uftj/sec) would pick up 914 mg/L TDS between near Bloomington, <br />Utah and reemergence as Littlefield Springs, AZ. While this is a <br />greater salt pickup than the present systen (787 mg/L), the resulting <br />quality of Littlefield Springs would be a 547 mg/L improvement over <br />present. This is due to an improvement irl the quality of thE water lost <br />to infiltration from 2133 mg/L to 1459 mg/L resulting from the removal <br />of La Verkin Springs. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />002623 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.