Laserfiche WebLink
<br />00 n 70.1,. <br /> <br />c.'ARR'.\'SOr0 <br /> <br />'AME:UDME..t-JT <br /> <br />LC-ONTI"-.lO!EO) <br /> <br />. fashioned by a' conference. com- <br />miltee. He said the amendment's <br />derc3t in the Ifou~e would se~ <br />riously jeopardize their chances of. <br />doing that. <br />"Here he is, a Democratic con-;_.. <br />gressman with. a Democratic. <br />speaker (House Speal,er Thomas, <br />O'NeIll!. You'd',almost thInk he <br />would say 'Hey, postpone this' <br />thing a week. We've got it moving <br />in another vehicle.' But now we've <br />'got a \'ote lhat's 314 to 67 and <br />trying to keep it in another ve- . <br />hide becomes that much more. <br />difficult." Andrews ..id. <br />-'--. "Ily bringing it up when he did <br />. at the worst possible tIme - <br />, he's made 'It extremely dificult for <br />I"" us to carry it through in the con. <br />tinuing resolution. ... . <br />"Had he just kept it off the noor.,' "I think 'it's a serious setback," <br />another 24 hours, we would have Dorgan said. .' <br />been through and I can't imagine, 'Richard Madson, regional vIce <br />why he didn't do that." . . " president Cor the National' Audu- <br />Counte,ed Dorgan: "I' 'did bon Society, was cheered by.the <br />e\'::::rylhi::g I could with the lead~ ... Garrison amendmenfs defeat. .,_: <br />ership in the House."I talked to" "In one line, we're exhausted <br />all of the leadership people, but andel'lted," lIladson 'said, "We <br />the fact is the ,consideratio'ns of ~ mou'nted one oC the'most intensive <br />what is considered on the noor of ,: national' campaigns' not only that <br />the House were far larger than. our society, but" ~other con. <br />the Garrison issue. servation organizations as. well, <br />"The fact is the tail doesn't wag have mounted all year.", ,; ," <br />the dog. The Garrison issue was Terming the. debate "the' most <br />such a .mall part of this large ap- vigorous debale r've ever watched <br />propriations bill, and the. decision' in ll'!e House of , Representatives,"' <br />of the leade<ship to bring that bill Madson said: "I would predict it <br />to thc floor had nothing to do with" will not only endanger .funding In <br />Garrison. ... the house, it should eliminate it:' <br />"Congress i~ not going to be The AuduLon Society favors <br />changing its agenda substantially junking Garrison Diversion~. re- <br />for-a $4 million issue. That just evaluating water, needs' and <br />doesn't happen. Mark knows sources in the state, .and consid- <br />that." . "ring other water projects.- in- <br />Dorgan said he belie\'es the. eluding a pipeline system -'as'al- <br />Garrison amendment could have ternatives, Mads')" said. <br />i:)cen approved if it hall been i <br />aoned an!y to the. contiEuing reso- ,. <br />Julion. <br />Adding it onto an appropriations .l <br />bi!! mt.:.1nt that oppoilents in the 1 <br />Hou~e (,(lUlr' geparille it from tht:' <br /> <br />(Continued from Page 1) <br /> <br />House. I would have expected, <br />had he had some suggestions or <br />criticisms, that he certainly would <br />h::lv~ pa,)sf~d them on to me in a <br />constructive way. <br />"For him, now after the vote, to <br />issue srcond-guesses...is more a <br />statcmCilt about him than, I <br />guess, about me." <br />AndrcVts said he and Burdick <br />would try Lo have the pro.Garri- <br />son aml~ndment added to the con- <br />tinuing resolution bill, the emer- <br />genc)' ~rp.!lriing mCi1s:Jrc being <br /> <br />_c. <br /> <br />. main bill f~r a v~te; Dorgan said. <br />"This was the only water proj- <br />ect in the nation thal w3s'..avaiJ- <br />able for a separate vote today be- <br />cause ~! the special languag~I" <br />Dorgan said. "Every environmen- <br />tal group in the country, plus _the <br />wildliCe' Cederation, plus the. na- <br />. tional taxpayers union"':"" I me.an <br />.they all focused all oC their efCods <br />on this one issue, ... .. -:....~:.: <br />-. "Look. the two senators in- <br />itiated this. They rut the language <br />in ov.er in the Senate. I made it <br />clear that it was going to be diCfi- <br />cult, vei)" difficuil La get this kind <br />of language through the House. <br />They decided. they wanted to go <br />with it anyway, and that's their <br />:.. prerogrative." <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />