My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07404
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07404
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:27:09 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:18:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1965
Author
Unknown
Title
Draft - How California Plans Water Development - Report of the Coordinated Planning Subcommittee - December 1965
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002422 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />economic demand (actual demand at the probable cost of Project water) <br />for imported water. One result was the approximate cost of Project <br />water, based on probable yield and development and conveyance. <br /> <br />In 1960 the voters of California approved a bond issue of $1. 75 billion <br />to build the State Water Facilities, the first authorized State constructed <br />unit of the California Water Plan. It would meet the water demands within <br />the State's service area until about 1990. <br /> <br />The year 1990 is only 25 years away. The history of planning for major <br />projects has invariably shown that at least two decades are required from <br />conception to fruition. Planning is continuous. The Department is inten- <br />sively planning now for projects to meet California's water needs beyond <br />1990. <br /> <br />The evolution of a project from the planning to the construction phas e <br />follows a prescribed procedure. Following the preliminary planning a <br />feasibility investigation is undertaken and a report recommending author- <br />ization and demonstrating the economic and financial feasibility is sub- <br />mitted to the Legislature. Authorization by the Legislature and approval <br />by the Governor includes the financing of the project. If such financing <br />is by means of General Obligation Bonds, the bond authorization must <br />be submitted to the general electorate for approval. The Department can <br />then proceed with construction. <br /> <br />To meet the obvious need for close water project cooperation in California, <br />the California State-Federal Inter-Agency Group was established in 1958. <br />Member agencies are the State Department of Water Res ources, the Bureau <br />of Reclamation, the Corps of Engineers, and the Soil Conservation Service. <br />The committee identifies and resolves gaps and duplication in project <br />planning, effects coordination, and also assigns specific responsibilities <br />to its Engineering Subcommittee. The so-called "Four Agency Committee" <br />guides such activities as the planning for the development of the Eel <br />River, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Facilities, the San Joaquin <br />Valley Drain, and the joint Federal-State San Luis Project. <br /> <br />In late 1961 Governor Brown established the Resources Agency of Cali- <br />fornia as part of a general reorganizat ion of the Executive Branch. For <br />the first time this placed all the natural resource departments in one <br />agency. In announcing the reorganization, Governor Brown commented <br />on the growth of State government and the resulting difficulty of pulling <br />together the varied programs of many departments. He said: <br /> <br />"One of the most serious consequences of this has been the <br />lack of adequate evaluation of existing programs and long <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />~ -.; ;.." <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.