Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />0216 <br /> <br />-3- <br /> <br />* These winter flows could be augmented by storing the 15 cubic <br />feet per second flow promised during the diversion season for both <br />the North Fork and Frying Pan and the resulting flow would maintain <br />flsh life during the non fishing season. <br /> <br />As a precedent for a complete study of the above suggestions, the following <br />is quoted from a paper delivered at the National Water Resources Conference in <br />Omaha, Nebraska on May CS, 1962 and is purp:;,r~ed to be the recommendations <br />of the Presidentls C:.:....-,..-I.:...::..:.0:":. on '.\r3.~=r i1esoure:s.::; .:: ._:--=.,: :..~i~7_,:;:j to and accepted <br />by the House anj S2nate; <br /> <br />Quote from page 23 under Conclusions of the above referenced paper. <br /> <br />"In water resource project planning, recreation can now be <br />treated on the same basis as other project purp':lses. This requires <br />that: <br /> <br />a. !--'!-r.:'~ec;ticr~ of f1..~tlL[e :12e'1:: Sl1lYJ.~d include estEr;2~~~ <br />of the p!c~,at~1... ~12rnanj for !"2cre;::t.l.c.r:. <br /> <br />o. frc.jcc:s should be:. d(;;:;igl'icd ro mir;.~mize 1035 of <br />exis ting and inherent recrea tional values. <br /> <br />c. Proj ects should be designed to permit realization of <br />their recreational potential to the full extent justified by the pr,)spec- <br />tive demand. <br /> <br />d. Recreation should be evaluated on a basis comparable <br />to that used for other project purposes to insure that net benefits, <br />-tangiblectnd-intangible; for-aU purposes are maximized."- <br />