My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07367
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07367
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:58 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:17:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.851
Description
La Verkin Springs Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/1/1979
Title
La Verkin Springs Unit Utah Status Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />estimate of formation permeability requirements and availability. An <br />assessment of potential subsurface environmental impacts will also be <br />performed. <br />If these activities indicate potential success, it is anticipated <br />that a test well would be drilled to more fully define subsurface <br />characteristics and potential environmental impacts of injecting. <br />Actual injection testing would be conducted during advance planning <br />and feasibility of the project would be subject to favorable results of <br />the testing. A cursory estimate of the construction costs of the <br />project injection well and appurtenant facilities is $8 million. <br />B. High Recovery Desalting Alternatives <br />For desalting options considered, higher recovery results in less <br />reject brine, and consequently lower costs for brine disposal. It also <br />reduces the loss of water from the river and the amount of water <br />rights to be acquired. Compared to 70-percent recovery, 80-percent <br />recovery reduces brine by 1/3 and 90-percent recovery by 2/3. <br />The electrodialysis desalting (ED) process is more costly to <br />construct than reverse osmosis (RO), but has lower operating cost at <br />recovery rates of 90 percent or more with La Verkin Springs' water. <br />Lime-ion exchange pretreatment uses less chemicals than the <br />lime-soda ash process, particularly with high recovery desalting. <br />The reject brine can be used to regenerate the ion-exchange modules, <br />and less sludge is produced than by the lime-soda ash process. At <br />the present time, a degree of confidence with which to recommend <br />feasibility is shared only by the RO process with the proven lime- <br />soda ash pretreatment, The opportunity for greater recovery with <br />less chemical use through ion exchange pretreatment holds promise for <br />increased effiCiency and these concepts are being pursued before a <br />firm decision is made on which method is more feasible. A contracted <br />field study to investigate the compatibility of various pretreatment <br />technologies with high recovery desalting options is underway on site. <br />The results of this study are anticipated to have important applica- <br />tions to the La Verkin Springs Unit as well as other salinity control <br /> <br />002530 <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.