Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.1 <br /> <br />3. Outfall inspection: There were no sludge deposits or <br />luxuriant growths in the discharge ditch. Either all <br />or part of the discharge water can be diverted to a <br />small retention pond which serves as a holding basin for <br />an irrigation system operated by a local farmer. At <br />times the holding basin discharges directly to the river. <br /> <br />4. Personnel and personal aspects: four full-time employees <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1 <br />.1 <br /> <br />D. Analytical Capabilities <br /> <br />1. Current analytical practices: <br /> <br />a) TSS (Gooch) infl, eff, 2/wk <br />b) BOD (manometric) infl. effl. daily <br />c) BOD (Winkler) infl. + effl. 2/wk <br />d) resid, C12 (3/day) iodometric colorimetric <br />e) VSS infl., effl, (2/wk) <br />f) sludge age <br />g) pH, daily, infl, and effl. <br />,~) DO (3/day) throughout plant <br />) proc. control by West method <br />j) turbo 3/day (effl,) Hach 2100 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2, Unused capabilities: fecal coliform, to begin soon <br /> <br />3, Sampling techniques: mostly composites proportional to <br />flow <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />V. SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION <br /> <br />A. Financial Condition: <br /> <br />The revenues are generated as follows: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Service charge <br /> <br />residence - $4.00 <br />commercial - 25% of January's water bill <br />total income - approximately $84,000 <br />total expense - approximately $128,000 <br /> <br />The difference comes from general revenues. <br /> <br />Indebtedness of approximately $500,000 - 1974. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />B. Current Planning: The <br />crease significantly. <br />and maintenance areas <br /> <br />service area <br />More drying <br />are needed. <br /> <br />is not expected to in- <br />beds, digestor capacity <br /> <br />134 <br /> <br />. <br />