My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07353
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07353
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:16:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20.E
Description
Galloway Project
State
CA
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/11/1984
Author
MWDSC
Title
Analyisis of Operation Agreement Between Galloway Group, Ltd., and San Diego County Water Authority
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />25. <br /> <br /> <br />cooperation between California and the other Colorado River <br /> <br /> <br />Basin states, which relationship has been very beneficial to <br /> <br /> <br />California and Metropolitan. It would mean that San Diego <br /> <br /> <br />County Water Authority and Metropolitan would, in effect, be <br /> <br /> <br />reversing their support for the Central Arizona Project now that <br /> <br /> <br />the project is almost complete. Arizona agreed on 1968 federal <br /> <br /> <br />legislation to give California, and therefDre Metropolitan, <br /> <br /> <br />complete priority over its project in return for that support. <br /> <br /> <br />Any action by California agencies that would circumvent the Law <br /> <br /> <br />of the River and jeopardize water relied on for the Central <br /> <br /> <br />Arizona Project would be seen as a breach of integrity. <br /> <br /> <br />Finally, the Galloway proposal, however doubtful its <br /> <br /> <br />prospect of success, .would be seized upon by opponents of the <br /> <br /> <br />State Water Project to promote their contention that no increase <br /> <br /> <br />in water exportation from Northern California is necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.