My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07342
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07342
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:51 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:16:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
5/19/1997
Author
James S. Lochhead
Title
The Perspective of the State of Colorado in 1922 - Did We get What We Bargained For?
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~. <br /> <br />Colorado River Compact Symposium <br />James S. Lochhead <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />must now go to the States and must make appropriations <br />under State laws and be entirely subservient to the <br />direction of ~he States. . . It is my opinion, that it <br />would be unwise for Congress to ratify the Compact <br />without a provision to the general effect that the <br />ratification is not intended to deprive29the United <br />States Government of any right it now has. <br /> <br />However, the efforts of Carpenter and other upper Basin <br />representatives were successful. When the Boulder Canyon <br />Project Act was finally passed in 1928, it approved the <br />Compact if any five states plus California would ratify it. <br />It contained no general federal reservation of rights. It <br />Subjected the rights of the United States in or to waters of <br />the Colorado River to the provisions of the Compact. It <br />gave the states an official advisory role, wi~h full access <br />to records, in the activities of the Secretary of the <br />Interior under the Act. Finally, it specifically disclaimed <br />any interference with the rights of the states to adopt laws <br />and policies concerning the appropriation, control and use <br />of waters within their borders, subject only to the Colorado <br />River Compact or other compacts. <br /> <br />Avoiding Litigation <br /> <br />At the opening meeting of the Commission, Herbert <br />addressed avoidance of litigation as one of the <br />purposes of the Compact: <br /> <br />Hoover <br />primary <br /> <br />It is hoped that such an agreement may be arrived at by <br />this Commission as will prevent endless litigation <br />which will inevitably arise in the conflict of state <br />rights, with the delays and costs that will be imposed <br />upon our citizens through such conflicts. The success <br />of its efforts wilm contribute to the welfare of <br />millions of people. <br /> <br />For his part, Carpenter responded to Hoover: <br /> <br />AS you well observed in your opening address the prime <br />object of the creation of this Commission was to avoid <br />future litigation among the states interested in the <br />Colorado River and the utilization of the benefits to <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />Hearing on H.R. 2903, Part V, p.898, March 25, 1924, <br />~otetl in Olson at p.167. <br />1 meeting of the compact Commission, Washington D.C., <br />January 26, 1922. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.