My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07323
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07323
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:47 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:15:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.31.J
Description
San Juan River - Environmental Studies
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
10/3/1996
Title
Biological Opinion on the Proposed Experimental Stocking of Early Life Stage Colorado Squawfish in the San Juan River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Biological Opinion
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />(-;.., <br />(.j <br /> <br />It then turns north and eventually reenters the extreme southwest corner of Colorado near <br />Four Corners, Downstream of Four Corners, the San Juan River enters Utah and continues <br />northwesterly through the towns of Aneth, Montezuma Creek; Bluff, and Mexican Hat. <br />Utah, and empties into Lake Powell near Piute Farms Wash. <br /> <br />i_,"\ <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Colorado squawfish spawn July 1 to September 1 in cobble/gravel areas typically found in <br />riffle/run habitats. Following hatch, larval Colorado squawfish drift downstream to low <br />velocity habitats. Important habitats during summer low flow (August) are the San Juan's <br />backwaters and secondary channels, used by larvae and young Colorado squawfish. <br />During 1995 investigations under the San Juan Recovery Implementation Program, low <br />\/elocity habitats were more common in August than June and comprised a greater <br />percentage of total habitat upstream from RM 110 than downstream. Low velocity <br />habitats peaked in abundance between'RM 120 and RM 180 (Holden and Masslich 19951. <br /> <br />The proposed study focuses on low-velocity habitat use by Age-O and Age-l Colorado <br />squawfish, Low-velocity habitats are riverine embayments and shoreline inconsistencies <br />that form when scoured areas peripheral to sand bars become isolated from the main <br />channel as high flows recede (backwaters) or from main channel obstructions that deter <br />flow (side channels), <br /> <br />In low-velocity habitats, young Colorado squawfish remain protected from main channel <br />high velocities, hazards, and further drift. Depending upon the mechanism of scouring, <br />location in the channel, sediment transport, and flow regime, low-\/elocity habitats vary in <br />depth, size, shape, and stability, In turn, these varying physical attributes result in <br />. different chemical and biological conditions among these habitats. Because hydrologic and <br />sediment transport regimes are affected by channel geometry, low-velocity habitat quality <br />also Changes among geomorphic reaches. Additionally, some flow regimes are more <br />conducive to the construction and maintenance of low-velocity habitats, rendering them <br />more abundant in certain seasons or years, depending upon flow regimes, <br /> <br />The necessary quality and quantity of low-velocity nursery habitat must be available at <br />certain locations and seasons in the San Juan River to accommodate the influx of drifting <br />Age-O Colorado squawfish from spawnjng areas. Operations from Navajo Dam may have <br />alter13d the natural spatial and temporal dynamics of low-velocity habitat. thus affecting <br />the life history of resident Colorado squawfish. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE <br /> <br />The environmental baseline includes the past and present impacts of all Federal, State, and <br />private actions and other human activities in the action area; the anticipated impacts of all <br />proposed Federal projects in the action area that have already undergone formal section 7 <br />consultation; and the impact of State or private actions contemporaneous with the <br />consultation process. <br /> <br />In formulating this biological opinion, the Service considered adverse and beneficial effects <br />likely to result from cumulative effects of future State, and private activities that are <br />reasonably foreseeable to occur within the project area, together with the direct and <br />indirect effects of the proposed experimental stocking and impacts from- actions that are <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.