Laserfiche WebLink
<br />for the period of March, April, and May, 1951, to near <br />normal and above normal for many precipitation stations in <br />eastern Colorado and western Kansas and Nebraska. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Correlation studies between stations in the seeded areas <br />arrd unseeded a~eas to the east, see Fig. 20, show that the <br />stations in the seeded areas received less precipitation <br />during Harch, April and !'lay, 1951, than would normally be <br />indicated on the basis of the correlation. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Precipitatio~ Patterns <br /> <br />The isopercential theory analysis of the rainfall <br />pattern change resulting from cloud seeding is not corepleted <br />to date wld hence the results will be described in the final <br />report. <br /> <br />A visual comparison of the isohyetal patterns on the <br />target area for March, 1951, and the normal Harch, see <br />Figs. 11 and 12, revealed no significant improvement in the <br />rainfall pattern for !'larch, 1951, due to cloud seeding. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'!Q" <br />'\~ <br /> <br />7 <br />