My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07317
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:26:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:15:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.140.20
Description
Colorado River Basin Organizations and Entities - Colorado River Basin States Forum - California
State
CA
Basin
Western Slope
Date
1/1/1971
Author
Myron B Holburt
Title
Annual Report for the Calendar Year 1970
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. , l'.. rl <br />i,-!uJ <br />struction of a replacement for an eXlstmg <br />dam and rehabilitation of an old irrigation <br />system. It was estimated that the proposed <br />works would increase project diversions <br />from the present 8,350 acre-feet per year to <br />14,800 acre-feet per year in order to provide <br />full irrigation on 3,935 acres of developed <br />land, and may permit some additional land to <br />be cultivated. <br />The Colorado River Board prepared com- <br />ments which the Secretary for Resources, <br />Norman B. Livermore, transmitted by letter <br />dated August 12, 1970, to the Regional Direc- <br />tor, Region 4 of the U. S. Bureau of Reclama- <br />tion. California requested that the Bureau of <br />Reclamation evaluate the effect of the <br />proposed project on the salinity of return <br />flows and investigate means of reducing the <br />salt load to the river. <br />On November 6, 1970, the Commissioner <br />of Reclamation replied to California's com- <br />ments regarding the proposed development. <br />The Commissioner stated that the increased <br />water supply to be developed by the Over- <br />land Ditch and Reservoir Company would be <br />used almost exclusively to firm up existing <br />water supplies for presently irrigated acre- <br />age and that the net effect upon flows of the <br />Colorado River would be minimal. There- <br />fore, the Bureau of Reclamation concluded <br />that a comprehensive evaluation of the <br />proposed project's water quality effects <br />would not be warranted at this' time. The <br />Commissioner did, however, share concern <br />for Colorado River salinity problems and <br />stated that the Bureau would be willing to <br />participate in a multistate-federal study and <br />that this matter would receive careful atten- <br />tion in the Western United States Water Plan <br />studies. <br /> <br />Navajo Generating Station Cooling Water <br /> <br />In September 1970, the Board received a <br />copy of a report prepared by the Bechtel cor- <br />poration on methods of handling cooling wa- <br />ter blowdown at the Navajo Generating Sta- <br />tion, a proposed 2,310,000 kilowatt thermal <br />plant near Page, Arizona. The Salt River <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />Project, as Manager of the Navajo Project, <br />invited representatives of concerned federal <br />and state agencies to comment on the Bechtel <br />report. The report considered a number of <br />alternatives and recommended the least cost <br />alternative which would involve return of <br />untreated blowdown water to Lake Powell. <br />The Chief Engineer prepared a statement <br />for the October 7, 1970, meeting called by the <br />Salt River Project and this was concurred in <br />by the State Water Resources Control Board, <br />the Department of Water Resources, and the <br />Los Angeles Department of Water and Pow- <br />er, which is one of the five participating utili- <br />ties of the project. At the meeting, the Chief <br />Engineer presented an analysis of the pro- <br />jected increased salinity at California points <br />of diversion which would occur if the Bech- <br />tel recommendation was carried out and the <br />cost detriments resulting from this salinity <br />increase to California. The impact on other <br />basin states and Mexico was also discussed. <br />Comparisons were made with data from the <br />Board's August 1970 salinity report, and it <br />was found that the cost of several of the alter- <br />native methods of disposing of the blowdown <br />water were in the same unit cost range of the <br />potential salinity control projects identified <br />in the Board's report. Accordingly, it was <br />recommended that participants in the Nava- <br />jo Generating Station adopt one of the alter- <br />natives of handling salinity blowdown that <br />would prevent the salts contained therein <br />from entering the Colorado River System. <br />The Federal Water Q!!ality Administration <br />supported the Board's position at the meet- <br />ing. <br />Subsequently, the Board was informed <br />that participants in the Navajo Generating <br />Station had directed the Bechtel Corporation <br />to make more complete investigations and <br />report on alternatives which would not re- <br />turn the concentrated solution to the Colo- <br />rado River system. Complying with this di- <br />rective, the Bechtel Corporation prepared a <br />report entitled "Draft of Environmental <br />Statement, Navajo Project," dated January <br />1971. The report stated that a plan would be <br />developed to eliminate any return of cooling <br /> <br />'I, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.