Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\ <br /> <br />l <br />I <br /> <br />,. .t,"\-, <br />.i. 'i \).j <br /> <br />To the extenr that any deficiency in reim- <br />bursement remains as of June 1, 1987, the <br />amount of the deficiency shall then be trans- <br />ferred to the Upper Colorado River Basin <br />Fund from the Lower Colorado River Basin <br />Development Fund (established by P.L. 90- <br />537). <br />In transmitting the proposed Operating <br />Criteria to the governors of the Colorado <br />River Basin states on December 16, 1969, the <br />Secretary reopened the issue of whether or <br />not the Glen Canyon Filling Criteria should <br />be conrinued. This was due to the strong op- <br />position by Upper Basin states during the <br />seven-state task force studies of the Operat- <br />ing Criteria in 1969 to the Hoover deficiency <br />paymenrs. Their arguments were primarily <br />based on assertions that deficiency payments <br />under the Filling Criteria are incompatible <br />with Section 602 of P.L. 90-537, and that <br />reservoirs can not be operated in accordance <br />with both the proposed Operating Criteria <br />and the Filling Criteria.The Secretary asked <br />for comments by April 1, 1970, on the ques- <br />tion of early termination of the Filling Crite- <br />ria as well as on the proposed Operating Cri- <br />teria. <br />California developed, through engineering <br />and legal analyses, strong arguments against <br />the Upper Basin states' assertions. Cali- <br />fornia's statement was transmitted to the <br />Secretary of the Interior by a letter signed by <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />Secretary for Resources Norman B. Liver- <br />more, Jr., on April 1, 1970. Similar statements <br />were submitted by Arizona and Nevada. The <br />Metropolitan Water District of Southern <br />California and the Southern California Edi- <br />son Company also submitted statemenrs to <br />the Secretary of the Inferior in which they <br />supported California's statemenr. <br /> <br />California also prepared a rebuttal state- <br />ment to the Upper Basin's commenrs regard- <br />ing early termination of the Filling Criteria, <br />which was transmitted to the Secretary of <br />the Interior by a letter signed by Governor <br />Reagan on May 14, 1970. <br /> <br />In transmitting the final Operating Crite- <br />ria to the governors of the seven Colorado <br />River Basin states on June 8, 1970, the Secre- <br />tary of the Interior also announced that the <br />Filling Criteria would not be terminated at <br />this time. Thus, payments worth millions of <br />dollars to Hoover power contractors will <br />continue. However, the Secretary attempted <br />to meet the objections of the Upper Basin <br />states in part by stating that, except as lim- <br />ited by minor variations in marketing condi- <br />tions, all energy to meet Hoover deficiencies <br />in the future is expected to be purchased. <br />Under Section 502 of P.L. 90-537, these costs <br />will be repaid to the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin Fund. <br /> <br />19 <br />